2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of a correlation between the sonographic appearance and molecular subtype of invasive breast cancer: A review of 311 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, it was reported that the tumor size, patient age, and nodal status were significantly associated with the biological characteristics of tumors . For instance, a tumor size larger than 2 cm was more common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple‐negative subtypes of IBC; patients younger than 50 years showed more hormone receptor–negative cancers compared with older patients; and nodal metastases were more frequent in patients with the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype . Therefore, when evaluating the biological properties of tumors, these preoperative clinical parameters should be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, it was reported that the tumor size, patient age, and nodal status were significantly associated with the biological characteristics of tumors . For instance, a tumor size larger than 2 cm was more common in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and triple‐negative subtypes of IBC; patients younger than 50 years showed more hormone receptor–negative cancers compared with older patients; and nodal metastases were more frequent in patients with the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype . Therefore, when evaluating the biological properties of tumors, these preoperative clinical parameters should be taken into consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors from ultrasound images, previous studies have focused on the correlation between imaging features and molecular subtypes. Breast cancers with the triple-negative subtype were more likely to be associated with circumscribed margins and were less associated with calcifications (15)(16)(17)(18). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (+) breast cancers usually show enhanced posterior acoustics on ultrasound images (15,17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast cancers with the triple-negative subtype were more likely to be associated with circumscribed margins and were less associated with calcifications (15)(16)(17)(18). Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (+) breast cancers usually show enhanced posterior acoustics on ultrasound images (15,17). Tumors with posterior shadowing are often found in hormone receptor (HR) (+) HER2 (-) breast cancers (16,19,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the primary limitation of ultrasound as a means of radiogenomics analysis is that image acquisition is highly user-dependent which hampers retrospective datasets. US is consequently the least studied modality for radiogenomics (25)(26)(27)(28)(29). To improve image reproducibility, images from automatic breast ultrasound images can be analyzed such as in the work by Zheng et al (27).…”
Section: Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These imaging variables must be well-defined to limit inter-or intraobserver variability and therefore features used in clinical practice such as the BI-RADS descriptors are often used (40). For example, Wu et al found that HER2-enriched molecular subtype breast cancers were associated with the BI-RADS ultrasound margin descriptors of indistinct and spiculated (26). Human identified features offer the potential advantage of being easier to adopt into clinical practice, but the scope of potential features is limited and even the most well-defined features have notable inter-observer variability (41,42).…”
Section: Image Analysis Imaging Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%