2014
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00901-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of 10 Cowpox Virus Proteins That Are Necessary for Induction of Hemorrhagic Lesions (Red Pocks) on Chorioallantoic Membranes

Abstract: Cowpox viruses (CPXV) cause hemorrhagic lesions ("red pocks") on infected chorioallantoic membranes (CAM) of embryonated chicken eggs, while most other members of the genus Orthopoxvirus produce nonhemorrhagic lesions ("white pocks"). Cytokine response modifier A (CrmA) of CPXV strain Brighton Red (BR) is necessary but not sufficient for the induction of red pocks. To identify additional viral proteins involved in the induction of hemorrhagic lesions, a library of single-gene CPXV knockout mutants was screened… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one potential explanation for restricted cell infiltration may be the lack of blood vessels growing into the central cornea of the VACV-infected mice. The explanation for why blood vessel infiltration is restricted is not clear, but it is known that only cowpox and rabbitpox viruses induce hemorrhagic pocks on chorioallantoic membranes and that this is due to the expression of specific viral genes (42). The lack of this capability in strain WR could explain the restricted vascularization of the cornea.…”
Section: Fig 9 Flow Cytometry Analysis Of T-cell Subsets In Infected mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, one potential explanation for restricted cell infiltration may be the lack of blood vessels growing into the central cornea of the VACV-infected mice. The explanation for why blood vessel infiltration is restricted is not clear, but it is known that only cowpox and rabbitpox viruses induce hemorrhagic pocks on chorioallantoic membranes and that this is due to the expression of specific viral genes (42). The lack of this capability in strain WR could explain the restricted vascularization of the cornea.…”
Section: Fig 9 Flow Cytometry Analysis Of T-cell Subsets In Infected mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Recently, Xu and colleagues [ 27 ] have brought new information to bear on this issue. Using a library of 109 single-gene knockout variants of cowpox virus, in addition to the crmA and B5R genes, they identified 10 nonessential genes that are required for the production of red pocks by cowpox virus.…”
Section: Evs Suppress Immune Responses To Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… * Cowpox virus mutants lacking the ability to encode these proteins produced white pocks on the CAM [ 27 ]. **A cowpox virus mutant lacking the ability to encode the F13 protein failed to produce any pocks on the CAM [ 27 ]. …”
Section: Evs Suppress Immune Responses To Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated a nucleotide sequence identity of 99.2% to another German CPXV isolate, Ger2010MKY (CPXV-like 3, [28]), and a clustering together with Ectromelia virus (ECTV), and a separation from other CPXV isolates derived from either common voles or accidental host species. Viral replication on the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) resulted in hemorrhagic pocks typical for CPXV [33], whereas ECTV develops non-hemorrhagic pocks on the CAM [34]. The taxonomical species definition for other orthopox viruses conceded the presumption that the different clades "CPXV-like 1", "CPXV-like 2", and "CPXV-like 3" would be better classified as different species within the genus Orthopoxvirus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%