2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification, characterization and in silico ADMET prediction of Roflumilast degradation products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the toxicological profile, the cardiotoxicity was evaluated by the qualitative estimation of the hERG potassium channel inhibition in humans, which is related to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death 32 . The prediction of hepatotoxicity considered the likelihood of causing a serum increase in alkaline phosphatase, gamma‐glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase enzymes 33 . Mutagenicity was evaluated based on the Ames test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the toxicological profile, the cardiotoxicity was evaluated by the qualitative estimation of the hERG potassium channel inhibition in humans, which is related to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death 32 . The prediction of hepatotoxicity considered the likelihood of causing a serum increase in alkaline phosphatase, gamma‐glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase enzymes 33 . Mutagenicity was evaluated based on the Ames test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The prediction of hepatotoxicity considered the likelihood of causing a serum increase in alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase enzymes. 33 Mutagenicity was evaluated based on the Ames test. Acute toxicity was based on the amount of orally administered chemical (in mg/kg body weight) required to kill 50% of the rats tested (LD 50 ), the risk is indicated by LD 50 lower than 200−300.…”
Section: Toxicological Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Though the identification and preparations. 19,21,22 We initiated an attempt in this regard by developing an easy,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in silico approaches are quite popular to facilitate toxicity prediction of potential DPs. They provide an added advantage against dedicated animal experiments and standardize the limits of respective DPs in pharmaceutical preparations 19,21,22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in silico tools have been widely used to predict the toxicity endpoints of DPs (Pinheiro et al, 2017). Besides the advantage of reducing animal testing, the risk assessment of the DPs through in silico approaches is useful to establish the limits of potentially toxic compounds (ICH, 2006a; Pinheiro et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%