2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and validation of colorectal neoplasia-specific methylation biomarkers based on CTCF-binding sites

Abstract: To date, the sensitivity of currently available biomarkers based on the methylation of gene promoters is suboptimal for detecting adenomas and early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to develop biomarkers with methylated DNA binding sites of the multifunctional transcriptional factor CTCF for early detection of CRC. Using combined analyses of genome-wide occupation and the methylation profile of CTCF-binding sites, we identified candidate CTCF-binding sites. Then, we applied methylation-sensitive high-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The five potential zinc-finger protein CCCTC-binding factors function as transcriptional activator, repressor, or insulator proteins; CTCF_33, CTCF_55, CTCF_94, CTCF_113, and CTCF_13 biomarkers analyzed in a study from China showed better performance than two well-known methylation biomarkers, NDRG4 and BMP3. Furthermore, with a sensitivity of 93.54% and a specificity of 94.05% ( Figure 5 ), CTCF-binding sites may be possible biomarkers in colorectal cancer detection [ 92 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The five potential zinc-finger protein CCCTC-binding factors function as transcriptional activator, repressor, or insulator proteins; CTCF_33, CTCF_55, CTCF_94, CTCF_113, and CTCF_13 biomarkers analyzed in a study from China showed better performance than two well-known methylation biomarkers, NDRG4 and BMP3. Furthermore, with a sensitivity of 93.54% and a specificity of 94.05% ( Figure 5 ), CTCF-binding sites may be possible biomarkers in colorectal cancer detection [ 92 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the assessment of each mCTCF-binding site exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity for stage I-II than for terminal stages. Moreover, when a panel of five mCTCF-binding sites was examined, a sensitivity of 91.67% and a specificity of 94.05% were recorded for adenomas, pointing towards a more precise early-stage biomarker [ 92 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aberrations of CTCF bindings depend on many mechanisms, including DNA methylation at the imprinting control region observed in testicular germ-cell tumors (TGCTs), CRC, bladder cancer, and ovarian cancer [87]. Liu et al [88] indicated a set of five biomarkers (CTCF_13 [chr10: 15761963-15762083], CTCF_33 [chr13: 61564369-61564467], CTCF_55 [chr17: 27940559-27940669], CTCF_94 [chr4: 165304966-165305120], and CTCF_113 [chr8: 69243102-69243188]) based on the methylation status of CTCF binding sites that were considered as a diagnostic marker panel in CRC (Table 3) [88]. This panel achieves a sensitivity of 91.67% for adenomas, 97.44% for stage I CRC, 94.06% for stage II CRC, 93.62% for stage III CRC, and 93.54% for total colorectal tumors with a specificity of 94.05%.…”
Section: Chromatin Conformation In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%