2022
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.66536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Model Based on Three MVI-Related Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is still a bottleneck in the treatment of HCC. Despite the use of various therapies to treat HCC, the prognosis of HCC remains poor due to the high frequency of metastasis and recurrence, with a poor ve-year survival rate [17][18][19] . Therefore, it is necessary to nd biomarkers that can diagnose HCC as early as possible and to study more molecular pathways and possible resistance mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still a bottleneck in the treatment of HCC. Despite the use of various therapies to treat HCC, the prognosis of HCC remains poor due to the high frequency of metastasis and recurrence, with a poor ve-year survival rate [17][18][19] . Therefore, it is necessary to nd biomarkers that can diagnose HCC as early as possible and to study more molecular pathways and possible resistance mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MVI has been identified as an important histological parameter and limitational factor for OS and RFS after liver resection and transplantation before [ 33 , 34 ]. Although examination of suitable preoperative MVI prediction models is becoming more popular in recent years, postoperative histopathological examination currently seems to be the only valid option for proving MVI in HCC at current state [ 35 , 36 ]. Further we could identify the number of nodules as independent predictor for OS as also commonly known risk factor for reduced OS [ 37 , 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced sequencing technologies have enabled large datasets, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), which have driven the search for novel and relevant cancer prognostic biomarkers (Wadowska et al, 2020, Holdenrieder, 2016. These studies demonstrated the huge potential of using public database resources to develop prognostic risk models, and there has been a growing body of research based on these two databases in recent years (Zhang et al, 2021, Wang et al, 2021, Tang et al, 2022. Ongoing assessment of these markers in a clinical setting may allow researchers to detect and analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in various cancer types, which may help identify malignancy-associated gene signatures and allow clinicians to better manage cancer patients and design appropriate therapies (Ahluwalia et al, 2021, Huang et al, 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%