2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea by a primary care team with a subset focus on chronic pain management

Abstract: Background Patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), who also consume prescription opioids, have a greater likelihood of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated whether a primary care team, focused on chronic pain care management, could use a validated questionnaire (STOP-Bang) and motivational follow-up, to increase identification and treatment of OSA. Methods This study was a retrospective, dual arm, pre/post controlled study. Participants of this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A search of electronic databases identified 115 reports, of which 98 were excluded based on information from the title and abstract. The remaining 17 articles were evaluated for inclusion by reviewing their full text and resulted in the exclusion of 6 records for the following reasons: (1) focused on motivational App development and testing ( n = 1; Alismail and Olfman, 2020 ), (2) aimed at validating a screening questionnaire ( n = 1; Sawyer et al, 2014 ), (3) was a review ( n = 1; Weaver, 2019 ) or (4) a protocol study ( n = 1; Williams et al, 2014 ), (5) OSAS was not reported as the primary diagnosis ( n = 1; Whittington et al, 2020 ) and (6) employed a mixed-method study design ( n = 1; Broström et al, 2013 ). Eleven records finally were included in this review (Roecklein et al, 2010 ; Sparrow et al, 2010 ; Olsen et al, 2012 ; Aloia et al, 2013 ; Lai et al, 2014 ; Lo Bue et al, 2014 ; Dantas et al, 2015 ; Bakker et al, 2016 ; Jean-Louis et al, 2017 ; Pengo et al, 2018 ; Rudilla et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A search of electronic databases identified 115 reports, of which 98 were excluded based on information from the title and abstract. The remaining 17 articles were evaluated for inclusion by reviewing their full text and resulted in the exclusion of 6 records for the following reasons: (1) focused on motivational App development and testing ( n = 1; Alismail and Olfman, 2020 ), (2) aimed at validating a screening questionnaire ( n = 1; Sawyer et al, 2014 ), (3) was a review ( n = 1; Weaver, 2019 ) or (4) a protocol study ( n = 1; Williams et al, 2014 ), (5) OSAS was not reported as the primary diagnosis ( n = 1; Whittington et al, 2020 ) and (6) employed a mixed-method study design ( n = 1; Broström et al, 2013 ). Eleven records finally were included in this review (Roecklein et al, 2010 ; Sparrow et al, 2010 ; Olsen et al, 2012 ; Aloia et al, 2013 ; Lai et al, 2014 ; Lo Bue et al, 2014 ; Dantas et al, 2015 ; Bakker et al, 2016 ; Jean-Louis et al, 2017 ; Pengo et al, 2018 ; Rudilla et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%