2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00948-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Structure of the Anti-sigma Factor-binding Domain of the Disulphide-stress Regulated Sigma Factor σR from Streptomyces coelicolor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether this reflects the natural situation whereby free and active ECF sigma factors are readily turned over, perhaps to ensure that continued activation of target genes is dependent upon ongoing synthesis of the sigma factors (an indicator that they are still required) and allowing the system to quickly respond to absence of inducing conditions, is unclear. Certainly, proteolysis and proteolytic control of sigma factor activity have been reported in bacteria (15,25,34 [23]) though generally via interaction with region 2 of these factors (1,23). The AsiA anti-sigma factor of phage T4 that controls 70 activity in E. coli is known to bind region 4 and to interfere with promoter binding (44), though AsiA is a soluble protein and it's not clear that a membranebound anti-sigma factor binding to the same region of a sigma factor would act in the same fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether this reflects the natural situation whereby free and active ECF sigma factors are readily turned over, perhaps to ensure that continued activation of target genes is dependent upon ongoing synthesis of the sigma factors (an indicator that they are still required) and allowing the system to quickly respond to absence of inducing conditions, is unclear. Certainly, proteolysis and proteolytic control of sigma factor activity have been reported in bacteria (15,25,34 [23]) though generally via interaction with region 2 of these factors (1,23). The AsiA anti-sigma factor of phage T4 that controls 70 activity in E. coli is known to bind region 4 and to interfere with promoter binding (44), though AsiA is a soluble protein and it's not clear that a membranebound anti-sigma factor binding to the same region of a sigma factor would act in the same fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because most transcription in rapidly growing cells involves stable RNA synthesis, and rRNA promoters are sensitive to Rif, the addition of Rif might cause a rapid increase in the availability of RNAP as continued initiation at rRNA promoters is blocked. RNAP and RsrA are in competition for σ R binding (Li et al, 2002), and so the outcome might be an increase in the concentration of σ R -RNAP holoenzyme, leading to an increase in σ activity. A related 'passive' model was proposed to explain why amino acid biosynthetic promoters are induced during amino acid starvation: the inhibition of rRNA synthesis by ppGpp (in concert with DksA), is thought to increase available RNAP levels, thereby stimulating transcription from amino acid promoters that have slow RNAP association rates (Zhou and Jin, 1998;Barker et al, 2001).…”
Section: Why Is σ R Activity Induced By Rif?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the best-characterized ECF sigma factor in S. coelicolor is σ R , which controls the cytoplasmic disulphide stress response (Paget et al ., 1998;Kang et al ., 1999). In response to unwanted disulphide bond formation in the cytoplasm, the activity of σ R increases through the oxidative inactivation of its zinc-binding antisigma factor RsrA (Kang et al ., 1999;Li et al ., 2002;. σ R is then free to bind to core RNAP and activate the expression of the σ R regulon, which numbers at least 30 transcription units and encodes several enzymes, including the thiore-doxin system, that help restore the thiol-disulphide redox balance (Paget et al ., 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, these include a trans-membrane protein with an extracytoplasmic sensory domain and an intracellular inhibitory domain functioning as an anti-sigma factor that binds and inhibits the cognate sigma factor. Although only a limited number of examples have been shown, direct interaction with sigma factor and anti-sigma factor has been reported for E. coli SigE and RseA (Campbell et al, 2003;Raivio & Silhavy, 2001), FecI and FecR (Enz et al, 2000), P. aeruginosa AlgU and MucA (Rowen & Deretic, 2000), Rhodobacter sphaeroides SigE and ChrR (Newman et al, 2001), S. coelicolor SigR and RsrA (Li et al, 2002) and Myxococcus xanthus CarQ and CarR (Browning et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%