2015
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and relative quantification of phosphopeptides by a combination of multi‐protease digestion and isobaric labeling

Abstract: A workflow for the straightforward comparative analysis of protein phosphorylation in samples of low complexity, e.g. isolated proteins, was developed. The workflow is transferable to other posttranslational modifications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utilization of multi-proteases has been proven by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (via the separation of phosphoproteins) to involve trypsin alone, improving the protein sequence coverage due to the increasing diversity of the peptide sequences, and this can facilitate the identification of protein sequences lacking tryptic cleavage sites by application of different cleavage site specificities [40,41]. Non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) in cereals and soybeans provide physical barriers to prevent the action of exogenous enzymes on starch and protein [42].…”
Section: A-ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of multi-proteases has been proven by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (via the separation of phosphoproteins) to involve trypsin alone, improving the protein sequence coverage due to the increasing diversity of the peptide sequences, and this can facilitate the identification of protein sequences lacking tryptic cleavage sites by application of different cleavage site specificities [40,41]. Non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) in cereals and soybeans provide physical barriers to prevent the action of exogenous enzymes on starch and protein [42].…”
Section: A-ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bartel et al used alternative proteases to trypsin, which reduced the spectral count for larger proteins and led to an improved identification of small proteins . Moreover, the application of multiple proteases has been established for several specific issues, e.g., phosphoproteomics, cross-linking mass spectrometry, C-terminomics, or paleoproteomics . Several tools for the in silico prediction of a suitable protease have been introduced. , However, due to the factors such as ionization efficiency or chromatographic co-elution, in silico -predicted peptides are not necessarily also identifiable in a real-life wet-lab experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Bartel et al used alternative proteases to trypsin, which reduced the spectral count for larger proteins and led to an improved identification of small proteins. 13 Moreover, the application of multiple proteases has been established for several specific issues, e.g., phosphoproteomics, 25 cross-linking mass spectrometry, 26 C-terminomics, 27 or paleoproteomics. 28 Several tools for the in silico prediction of a suitable protease have been introduced.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Several groups have demonstrated enhanced proteomic identification and/or PTM localization rates when using alternative proteases such as Lys-C, Asp-N, Glu-C, chymotrypsin, elastase, and subtilisin, often in combination with trypsin. 24, 2629 Aside from choice of protease, digestion protocols can be optimized according to temperature, denaturing reagent, time, and so forth. Filtered assisted sample preparation (FASP) and phase transfer surfactant-aided extraction (PTS) represent significant advances for phosphoproteome analysis of membrane proteins and tissue, whether fresh 30 or formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded.…”
Section: Sample Preparation For Mass Spectrometry-based Phosphoproteomentioning
confidence: 99%