2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41612-022-00294-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and quantification of giant bioaerosol particles over the Amazon rainforest

Abstract: Eukarya dominate the coarse primary biological aerosol (PBA) above the Amazon rainforest canopy, but their vertical profile and seasonality is currently unknown. In this study, the stratification of coarse and giant PBA >5 µm were analyzed from the canopy to 300 m height at the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory in Brazil during the wet and dry seasons. We show that >2/3 of the coarse PBA were canopy debris, fungal spores commonly found on decaying matter were second most abundant (ranging from 15 to 41%), followed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following these promising results in short‐term prediction for air pollutants, there have been numerous attempts at machine‐learned surrogate models for full atmospheric chemistry operators (Y. Huang & Seinfeld, 2022; Keller & Evans, 2019; Keller et al., 2017; Kelp et al., 2018, 2020, 2022; Schreck et al., 2022), but all have observed either numerical instability or “mean drift”—where model predictions drift away from reasonable values as the simulation progresses—or have not included experiments which tested for these phenomena. (Efforts to emulate only part of the chemistry operator have been more successful (Sharma et al., 2023). ) These challenges reflect general issues with recurrent time series prediction using neural networks and similar models, including the compounding accumulation of error (Sorjamaa et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following these promising results in short‐term prediction for air pollutants, there have been numerous attempts at machine‐learned surrogate models for full atmospheric chemistry operators (Y. Huang & Seinfeld, 2022; Keller & Evans, 2019; Keller et al., 2017; Kelp et al., 2018, 2020, 2022; Schreck et al., 2022), but all have observed either numerical instability or “mean drift”—where model predictions drift away from reasonable values as the simulation progresses—or have not included experiments which tested for these phenomena. (Efforts to emulate only part of the chemistry operator have been more successful (Sharma et al., 2023). ) These challenges reflect general issues with recurrent time series prediction using neural networks and similar models, including the compounding accumulation of error (Sorjamaa et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%