1988
DOI: 10.1021/bi00415a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and properties of an oxoferryl structure in myeloperoxidase compound II

Abstract: Myeloperoxidase compound II has been characterized by using optical absorption and resonance Raman spectroscopies. Compared to compounds II in other peroxidases, the electronic and vibrational properties of this intermediate are strongly perturbed due to the unusual active-site iron chromophore that occurs in myeloperoxidase. Despite this difference in prosthetic group, however, other properties of myeloperoxidase compound II are similar to those observed for this intermediate in the more common peroxidases (h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this interpretation, FeAO in F shows a more substantial H 2 O͞D 2 O frequency shift (24,54) and the oxo oxygen is more readily exchanged with solvent water (23). The hydrogen-bonding change at the FeAO moiety in F relative to P (1998) will affect both the optical properties of the heme chromophore and the vibrational properties of the HisOFe IV AO structure (50,(55)(56)(57)(58) (Table 1). Variation in the basicity of the proximal histidine is also a likely contributor to the optical and vibrational differences between the two intermediates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Consistent with this interpretation, FeAO in F shows a more substantial H 2 O͞D 2 O frequency shift (24,54) and the oxo oxygen is more readily exchanged with solvent water (23). The hydrogen-bonding change at the FeAO moiety in F relative to P (1998) will affect both the optical properties of the heme chromophore and the vibrational properties of the HisOFe IV AO structure (50,(55)(56)(57)(58) (Table 1). Variation in the basicity of the proximal histidine is also a likely contributor to the optical and vibrational differences between the two intermediates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, these compounds can be distinguished by the absorbance ratio A 6 2 5 nm/A456 nm which is 0.20 for compound I1 and 0.52 for compound I11 at neutral pH [22]. At high pH the absorption band shifts to 635 nm and the ratio A635 nm/A456 nm changes to 0.25 for compound 11 [23]. A similar value is calculated from the fairly stable final spectrum at pH 10.2 and shows that compound I1 is formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…MPO-II is more stable than MPO-I (36,46,47). A good preparation of MPO-II is obtained by adding a 50-fold excess of H 2 O 2 to pure native enzyme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%