2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and mapping of submerged plants in a shallow lake using quickbird satellite data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many remote sensing image classification analysis techniques have been tested, including supervised maximum likelihood classification [16], decision-tree classification [3], approaches based on artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic [17], unsupervised clustering classification [18], and the combination of remote sensing analysis with pre-acquired environmental data [19]. Vegetation indices can be used to analyze the vegetation signal in vegetation monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many remote sensing image classification analysis techniques have been tested, including supervised maximum likelihood classification [16], decision-tree classification [3], approaches based on artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic [17], unsupervised clustering classification [18], and the combination of remote sensing analysis with pre-acquired environmental data [19]. Vegetation indices can be used to analyze the vegetation signal in vegetation monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, macrophytes and phytoplankton may coexist for a long period of time in certain lakes undergoing eutrophication [9,31,32]. Given the ecological and economic value of aquatic vegetation, the monitoring of aquatic vegetation may be extremely useful in conservation planning and management of eutrophic shallow lakes [18]. Shallow lakes usually exhibit intrinsic spatial and temporal variability in the distribution of underwater light and aquatic vegetation [9,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilmore et al [72] utilized LiDAR and multi-temporal Quickbird imagery with an object-oriented classification approach to classify three marsh vegetation species. Dogan et al [73] and Yuan and Zhang [74] used 2.8 m pixel QuickBird imagery to classify submerged plants within wetlands. Thus, overall the accuracies achieved in this study for classification of within wetland vegetation and open water compare to other studies but, as stated above, the minimum mapping unit of this study is generally much smaller, providing capability to detect and map smaller patches of these features as well as logs that could not be achieved with high-resolution satellite imagery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies conducting accuracy assessments [31,38,39,[60][61][62] show kappa coefficients ranging between 0.57 and 0.92. The result of our study is at the lower end of the scale (kappa = 0.61).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sav Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies therefore evaluate mappings qualitatively [16,19,27,59]. Studies which determined discrete classes (e.g., less dense SAV, bare substrate, submerged, floating vegetation) collected field data by boat or ancillary maps to tabulate error matrices and associated accuracy measures [38,39,[60][61][62]. Dekker et al [26] recommend a minimum patch size of at least three times the pixel size covering homogenous coverage.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Sav Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%