2018
DOI: 10.5897/ajb2018.16661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) resistance in genotype UG 5

Abstract: Soybean rust, Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is one of the most serious and widespread foliar diseases of soybean causing high yield losses worldwide. The objective of this study was to identify and map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) resistant to soybean rust in genotype UG 5. Ninety-seven F 2 mapping plants, obtained from a cross between Wondersoya and UG 5, were used for this study. Quantitative trait locus analysis using QTL IciMapping software identified three putative QTLs associated with soybean rust (SBR) on ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsatellite markers are one of the most efficient types of molecular markers because of their high polymorphism, wide genome coverage, co-dominant inheritance, and good reproducibility (Powell et al, 1996;Gupta and Varshney, 2000;Varshney et al, 2005). Hence, they have been widely used in genetic linkage map, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding, evolutionary studies, and genetic diversity analysis (Nishio et al, 2008;Garvin et al, 2010;Ahmadi and Fotokian, 2011;Wang et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2019). Traditional methods for developing microsatellite markers are time-consuming, laborious, and expensive (Zane et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite markers are one of the most efficient types of molecular markers because of their high polymorphism, wide genome coverage, co-dominant inheritance, and good reproducibility (Powell et al, 1996;Gupta and Varshney, 2000;Varshney et al, 2005). Hence, they have been widely used in genetic linkage map, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, marker-assisted selection (MAS) breeding, evolutionary studies, and genetic diversity analysis (Nishio et al, 2008;Garvin et al, 2010;Ahmadi and Fotokian, 2011;Wang et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2019). Traditional methods for developing microsatellite markers are time-consuming, laborious, and expensive (Zane et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of the parental genotypes and 86 individual F 2 plants using CTAB (Lemos et al, 2011). After checking the purity and concentration of the DNA samples, screening was made using PCR with a total of 122 SSR markers (Hailay et al, 2018). Of the 33 polymorphic SSR markers obtained using QTL IciMapping 4.1 software, 13 SSR markers which were associated with the identified QTLs were used to genotype the F 2 progenies (Hailay et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After checking the purity and concentration of the DNA samples, screening was made using PCR with a total of 122 SSR markers (Hailay et al, 2018). Of the 33 polymorphic SSR markers obtained using QTL IciMapping 4.1 software, 13 SSR markers which were associated with the identified QTLs were used to genotype the F 2 progenies (Hailay et al, 2018). The phenotypic and genotypic data were deployed to map the putative QTLs using MapQTL version 4.0 software (Van Ooijen, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%