2021
DOI: 10.3982/qe1277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and inference with ranking restrictions

Abstract: We propose to add ranking restrictions on impulse‐responses to sign restrictions to narrow the identified set in vector autoregressions (VARs). Ranking restrictions come from micro data on heterogeneous industries in VARs, bounds on elasticities, or restrictions on dynamics. Using both a fully Bayesian conditional uniform prior and prior‐robust inference, we show that these restrictions help to identify productivity news shocks in the data. In the prior‐robust paradigm, ranking restrictions, but not sign restr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 If desired, several other restrictions can be incorporated in a straightforward way, such as ranking restrictions (Amir- Ahmadi and Drautzburg, 2021), restrictions on elasticities, or other restrictions on magnitudes of shocks. For example, if for shock j variable i should react with a larger magnitude than variable k, then we get the restriction Λ ij > Λ kj which is fairly simple to incorporate within an MCMC sampling setting.…”
Section: Vars Driven By a Few Common Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 If desired, several other restrictions can be incorporated in a straightforward way, such as ranking restrictions (Amir- Ahmadi and Drautzburg, 2021), restrictions on elasticities, or other restrictions on magnitudes of shocks. For example, if for shock j variable i should react with a larger magnitude than variable k, then we get the restriction Λ ij > Λ kj which is fairly simple to incorporate within an MCMC sampling setting.…”
Section: Vars Driven By a Few Common Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A much better algorithm in settings like this is the direct sampling approach proposed by Amir-Ahmadi and Drautzburg (2021). This imposes all the sign restrictions before drawing a candidate for Q instead of generating unrestricted values of Q and then discarding millions of draws.…”
Section: Computational Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the algorithm requires checking s n−f −1 combinations of restrictions, the algorithm may become slow or infeasible when there is a large number of sign restrictions. 7 A third approach to checking whether the identified set is empty is the 'Chebyshev criterion' proposed in Amir-Ahmadi and Drautzburg (2021). This algorithm is applicable when there are sign restrictions that constrain a single column of Q and there are no zero restrictions.…”
Section: Full Ambiguity (Gk)mentioning
confidence: 99%