2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Functional Characterization of N-Terminally Acetylated Proteins in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: A new study reveals a functional rule for N-terminal acetylation in higher eukaryotes called the (X)PX rule and describes a generic method that prevents this modification to allow the study of N-terminal acetylation in any given protein.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
173
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(109 reference statements)
11
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Independently of our work on cathepsin biology, we examined the N-␣ acetylation pattern in order to contribute to recent studies focusing on N-terminal protein acetylation (87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93). In this context, we present the first proteomic overview of N-␣ acetylation in mice.…”
Section: N-terminal Protein Acetylation Corresponds To Prototypicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently of our work on cathepsin biology, we examined the N-␣ acetylation pattern in order to contribute to recent studies focusing on N-terminal protein acetylation (87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93). In this context, we present the first proteomic overview of N-␣ acetylation in mice.…”
Section: N-terminal Protein Acetylation Corresponds To Prototypicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modification mechanism is used for 60 to 90% of all proteins in eukaryotes (Goetze et al, 2009), and it is conceivable that it also modifies plastid precursor proteins under normal wild-type conditions during their cytosolic synthesis and transition. The sequence context around the identified N-acetylation sites is consistent with described requirements for this type of modification (i.e., small, uncharged residues like Ala follow the start Met) (Sherman et al, 1985;Meinnel et al, 2006).…”
Section: N-terminal Met Excision and Acetylation Of Plastid Precursormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following transit peptide removal, the newly generated protein N terminus may be acetylated (Ferro et al, 2003;Kleffmann et al, 2007;Zybailov et al, 2008). N-acetylation is catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferases in the cytosol and in the plastid (Sherman et al, 1985;Meinnel et al, 2006;Goetze et al, 2009). It is therefore possible that a chloroplast-targeted protein may be acetylated as a precursor in the cytosol and after import and processing as the mature protein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In eukaryotes, cotranslational N-terminal Met excision (NME) by Met aminopeptidases (MetAP) and N-aterminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) catalyzed by N-terminal acetyltransferases (Nats) are two major protein modifications contributing to the diversity of protein N termini and to the N-end rule (Giglione et al, 2000(Giglione et al, , 2003Ross et al, 2005;Frottin et al, 2009;Gibbs et al, 2014a). Although limited studies have been conducted in plants on the N-end rule (Giglione et al, 2003;Graciet et al, 2009;Holman et al, 2009;Adam et al, 2011;Bienvenut et al, 2011;Gibbs et al, 2011Gibbs et al, , 2014bLicausi et al, 2011;Weits et al, 2014), recent genomic and N-terminal acetylome analyses in yeast, animals, and plants revealed that the NME and Nt-acetylation processes, along with the related enzymatic activities, are largely conserved through eukaryotic lineages (Polevoda et al, 1999;Arnesen et al, 2009;Goetze et al, 2009;Bienvenut et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2013). Particularly, in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that all MetAPs share similar substrate specificity, removing the first Met only when the second residue has a small radius of gyration of the side chain; on the contrary, bulky amino acids do not allow the removal of the first Met (Bienvenut et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%