2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification, and Experimental and Bioinformatics Validation of an Immune-Related Prognosis Gene Signature for Low-Grade Glioma Based on mRNAsi

Yuan Wang,
Shengda Ye,
Du Wu
et al.

Abstract: Background: Low-grade gliomas (LGGs), which are the second most common intracranial tumor, are diagnosed in seven out of one million people, tending to develop in younger people. Tumor stem cells and immune cells are important in the development of tumorigenesis. However, research on prognostic factors linked to the immune microenvironment and stem cells in LGG patients is limited. We critically need accurate related tools for assessing the risk of LGG patients. Methods: In this study, we aimed to identify imm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the GS score is significantly associated with prognosis in other cancer types, including liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), acute myeloid leukemia (LAML), prostate adenocarcinoma (PAAD), uveal melanoma (UVM), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) (Supplementary Figure 4J), suggesting that it may be a useful prognosis tool for a variety of cancers. Compared to existing LGG prognostic models [39][40][41][42], the GS model exhibited superior predictive performance, as evidenced by higher-index values (Figure 3J). The GS model also outperformed established clinical prognostic factors, including neoplasm grade, IDH1 mutation status, and MGMT promoter methylation, as indicated by higher area-under-the-curve (AUC) values in ROC curves (Figure 3K).…”
Section: Validation Of the Gmrgs-based Risk Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, the GS score is significantly associated with prognosis in other cancer types, including liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), acute myeloid leukemia (LAML), prostate adenocarcinoma (PAAD), uveal melanoma (UVM), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) (Supplementary Figure 4J), suggesting that it may be a useful prognosis tool for a variety of cancers. Compared to existing LGG prognostic models [39][40][41][42], the GS model exhibited superior predictive performance, as evidenced by higher-index values (Figure 3J). The GS model also outperformed established clinical prognostic factors, including neoplasm grade, IDH1 mutation status, and MGMT promoter methylation, as indicated by higher area-under-the-curve (AUC) values in ROC curves (Figure 3K).…”
Section: Validation Of the Gmrgs-based Risk Modelmentioning
confidence: 88%