2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and evaluation of defects in selective laser melted 316L stainless steel parts via in-situ monitoring and micro computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their research, Lu et al [ 5 ] examined microcomputed tomography as a validation method of correlating features observed in optical images. They found that features detected on the spot could be matched with defects detected by microcomputed tomography, thus revealing the possibility of using optical images as a means of defect detection, in their case, in the parts that were selected for melting by laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their research, Lu et al [ 5 ] examined microcomputed tomography as a validation method of correlating features observed in optical images. They found that features detected on the spot could be matched with defects detected by microcomputed tomography, thus revealing the possibility of using optical images as a means of defect detection, in their case, in the parts that were selected for melting by laser.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(h and i) image collected during SLM process and its binary processing results [71] ; (j) number of optical images and CT images collected under condition of single layer thickness distance [71] ; (k) relationship between image quantitative analysis results of each sample process and results of nondestructive testing [71] based on Archimedes' principle and mechanical properties of sample were correlated with the quantitative results of the image of sample during SLM process [Figs. 19 (f), (g)], which proved that the in situ monitoring system based on image processing was feasible to infer the mechanical properties of parts.…”
Section: Special Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 (f), (g)], which proved that the in situ monitoring system based on image processing was feasible to infer the mechanical properties of parts. Lu et al [71] conducted nondestructive testing on the parts by Micro CT based on the previous study [70] , and reconstructed the CT scan results of the components. The correlation between quantified features of images collected during SLM process and actual defects was verified.…”
Section: Special Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this, almost all laser PBF (L-PBF) system developers currently provide their machines with embedded powder bed cameras and, in some cases, with basic automated powder bed anomaly detection capability, albeit commonly limited to macroscopic errors [1,2]. Images acquired after the melting phase, once the solidification of the scanned area has occurred, may be used for different aims, such as detecting undesired surface irregularities in the solidified layers, as possible sources of internal and surface defects [6][7][8][9][10], or signaling possible deviations with respect to the nominal shape in the layer, as evidence of geometrical errors [11][12][13][14][15]. Alternative sensing methods have also been presented, including fringe projection combined with single or multiple cameras for surface topography reconstruction [16][17][18][19] and high-spatial-resolution scanning sensors installed onto the recoating arm [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%