2003
DOI: 10.3386/w9726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and Estimation of Dynamic Games

Abstract: This paper studies the identification problem in infinite horizon Markovian games and proposes a generally applicable estimation method. Every period firms simultaneously select an action from a finite set. We characterize the set of Markov equilibria. Period profits are a linear function of equilibrium choice probabilities. The question of identification of these values is then reduced to the existence of a solution to this linear equation system. We characterize the identification conditions.We propose a sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that ISP's split much more evenly than independent random choice would predict with the dartboard index of Ellison and Glaeser (1997). We confirm this result in a bivariate probit frame- 30 Shapiro and Varian suggest a faster diffusion process then we do prior to the ITU decision, relying mostly on announced adoption decisions for source material. Most of these announcements come from the medium to large firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We show that ISP's split much more evenly than independent random choice would predict with the dartboard index of Ellison and Glaeser (1997). We confirm this result in a bivariate probit frame- 30 Shapiro and Varian suggest a faster diffusion process then we do prior to the ITU decision, relying mostly on announced adoption decisions for source material. Most of these announcements come from the medium to large firms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, they do not offer a detailed explanation of why there was adoption failure previous to the ITU decision and do not consider incentives to differentiate across the standards by ISPs. 30 …”
Section: Sources Of Adoption Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that an equilibrium bid strategy for a type x is a bid in each state, and 15 A similar identification argument was made in a different context by Pesendorfer and Schmidt-Dengler (2003).…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows for a wide variety of dynamic investment decisions, but there is no characterization of its equilibrium set beyond the existence proof due to Doraszelski and Satterthwaite (2005). Accordingly, the estimation of this framework's unknown parameters either occurs "off-line", as in Benkard (2004), or by considering each firm's decision problem in isolation and letting the data reveal which equilibrium was played in sample, as in Bajari et al (2006) and Pesendorfer and Schmidt-Dengler (2003). Strictly speaking, the Ericson and Pakes framework encompasses our model, but we abstract from its most compelling feature, technological change arising from investment decisions.…”
Section: Timing and Expectational Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%