1986
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90784-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and characterization of a nuclear pore complex protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
412
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 596 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
28
412
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After high ionic strength salt extraction, punctate fluorescence was still detected, but there was a 50% decrease in intensity ( Figure If). This reactivity profile of serum LL-reactive antigens was similar to that reported for nuclear pore complex proteins (14,15).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After high ionic strength salt extraction, punctate fluorescence was still detected, but there was a 50% decrease in intensity ( Figure If). This reactivity profile of serum LL-reactive antigens was similar to that reported for nuclear pore complex proteins (14,15).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These proteins were enriched in nuclei and in nuclear envelope preparations. Treatment of these envelopes with 0.5M NaCl diminished the labeling of these bands (Figure 3), as was expected from the immunofluorescence results, and the solubility of known nuclear pore complex proteins (14). Incubation of nuclear envelopes with a buffer known to extract nuclear pore complexes abolished labeling of these proteins ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cells were grown to early log phase in YPD liquid at 23°C and were shifted to 37°C for varying times before fixation. Fixed cells were incubated with the appropriate antibody [undiluted tissue culture supernatant (tcs) MAb D77 (Henriquez et al, 1990) for detection of Noplp; 1:100 diluted tcs MAb 5B5 (gift from M. Rout and J. Kilmartin) for detection of Nsrlp; 1:50 diluted anti-f3-galactosidase MAb from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany); undiluted tcs MAb 12CA5 (Berkeley Antibody, Berkeley, CA) for detection of HAGle2p; undiluted tcs MAb 414 (Davis and Blobel, 1986) for detection of NPCs] for 16 h at 4°C. After washing with 40 mM K2HPO4, 10 mM KH2PO4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NaN3, 0.1% Tween 20, and 2% nonfat dry milk (M buffer) alone, detection of bound antibody was accomplished by incubation with affinity-purified fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Cappel Laboratories, Organon Teknika, Durham, NC) at a 1:100 dilution for 1 h at room temperature.…”
Section: Immunofluorescence and Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells were permeabilized with prechilled 0.5% Triton X in PBS or 40 g/ml digitonin (SigmaAldrich) in PBS for a total of 15 min, blocked with 5% milk in PBS for 30 min, and then washed three times with the same solution used in permeabilizing step (Adam et al, 1992). Permeabilized cells were then incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies for 1 h: undiluted mouse anti-UNC-83 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (as described above), rat anti-UNC-84 antibody used at a dilution of 1/1000 (as described above), mouse anti-nuclear pore complex monoclonal 414 antibody used at a dilution of 1/1000 (Covance) (Davis and Blobel, 1986), and goat anti-lamin B antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) used at a dilution of 1/100. After rinsing the cells three times with permeabilization buffer, a 1-h incubation with the appropriate secondary antibodies followed: donkey anti-mouse antibody conjugated to Cy3, donkey anti-rat antibody conjugated to Cy3, or donkey anti-goat antibody conjugated to Cy2 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%