“…32 P]-UTP+ Lane 1: S-100 extract; lanes 2-4: S-100 extract treated with micrococcal nuclease+ The 5S rRNA with different nucleotides in position 121 added to different tubes are shown on top of each lane+ All other details are as described in Figure 2A+ C: Analysis of the 39 uridylated U6 and 5S RNAs+ The 39 uridylated U6 snRNA RNA from Figure 4A, lane 3, and 39 uridylated 5S RNA from Figure 4B, lane 4, were isolated, purified, and digested to completion by T2 RNase+ The digestion products of U6 snRNA (left panel) and 5S RNA (right panel) were fractionated by twodimensional chromatography and subjected to autoradiography+ The unlabeled nucleotides visualized under UV light are shown as standard mononucleotide markers+ extensive posttranscriptional uridylation on the 39 end of U6 snRNA (Rinke & Steitz, 1985;Reddy et al+, 1987;Terns et al+, 1992;Gu et al+, 1997)+ The 39 processing is a dynamic process where uridylation and deuridylation occur simultaneously (Gu et al+, 1997)+ Booth andPugh (1997) reported the presence of a nuclease specific for the 39 end of U6 snRNA+ One possible function of the 39 uridylation is to rebuild 39 ends that are shortened by 39 exonucleases+ If true, the sequence that is rebuilt by uridylation will contain only U residues no matter what the sequence was in the primary transcript+ The data obtained in the case of human U6 snRNA is consistent with this hypothesis+ The nucleotide corresponding to position 102 in the human U6 snRNA gene and in the RNA primary transcript is A (see Table 1 and Fig+ 6, right panel)+ However, in one interesting clone out of nearly 100 human U6 snRNA clones sequenced, the nucleotide corresponding to position 102 is uridylic acid instead of A (see Fig+ 6, left panel)+ These data show that trimming is not confined to the 39 uridylic acid residues and rebuilding of the 39 end is only by uridylation, no matter what the nucleotide was in the primary RNA transcript+ Therefore, detection of U6 snRNA transcripts in which adenylic acid residue corresponding to position 102 has been replaced with uridylic acid strongly supports the possibility that one of the functions of 39 uridylation is to rebuild the 39 ends trimmed by exonucleases+ All previously published data and the results presented in this study are supportive of a mechanism where two competing processes work on the 39 end of small RNAs+ Uridylation is one process that adds uridylic acid residues to 39 U OH -containing small RNAs; this has been shown to be true for U6 snRNA and 5S rRNA in vivo and in vitro+ Adenylation is the other process where a single adenylic acid residue is added to the 39 end; this has been shown to occur in vivo on the 39 ends of SRP, 7SK, U2, 5S, and U6 snRNAs+ However, the 39 A OH -containing RNAs cannot be uridylated+ Thus, the extent of 39 adenylation modulates the 39 uridylation+ These data are supportive of a hypothetical model that is summarized and presented in Figure 7+ As shown in this figure, uridylation and deuridylation are reversible; similarly, adenylation and deadenylation are also reversible+ Although 39 U OH -containing RNAs can be adenylated, 39 A OH -containing RNAs cannot be uridylated+…”