2003
DOI: 10.5209/rev_rema.2003.v16.n1.16865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability, stability and reconstruction results of point sources by boundary measurements in heteregeneous trees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Observing data over spatial sets like (3) in inverse problems is not new. [7,8] In [8] (see also [9, chap.7, sec.2]), the authors analyze the wave equation problem…”
Section: Main Results To Be Provedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observing data over spatial sets like (3) in inverse problems is not new. [7,8] In [8] (see also [9, chap.7, sec.2]), the authors analyze the wave equation problem…”
Section: Main Results To Be Provedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be also noticed that the analysis of this inverse problem is not only important per se, but it will provide a theoretical foundation to other identification methods, such as the Statistical Energy Method, which are used to locate vibration sources in complex structures by the flow energy balance among their components and by measurements taken on few accessible sites only. For the sake of completeness, we recall that Nicaise and Zaïr have considered in [10] the problem of determining point sources in a mechanical system obtained by the connection of a finite number of taut strings from Neumann boundary observations taken on a part of the boundary of the system. However, the analysis of string-like structures involves second order differential operators in the space variable rather then fourth order as in the case of beams and plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave equation. We start with the so-called identity with multiplier (compare with Lemma 3.1 of [35]) which is the key identity for an observability estimate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%