Identifiability, Risk, and Information Credibility in Discussions on Moral/Ethical Violation Topics on Chinese Social Networking Sites

Abstract

One heated argument in recent years concerns whether requiring real name supervision on social media will inhibit users' participation in discoursing online speech. The current study explores the impact of identification, perceived anonymity, perceived risk, and information credibility on participating in discussions on moral/ethical violation events on social network sites (SNS) in China. In this study, we constructed a model based on the literature and tested it on a sample of 218 frequent SNS users. The results demonstrate the influence of identification and perception of anonymity: although the relationship between the two factors is negative, both are conducive to participation in discussion on moral/ethical violation topics, and information credibility also has a positive impact. The results confirmed the significance of risk perception on comments posted about moral/ethical violation. Our results have reference value for identity management and internet governance. Policies regarding users' real names on the internet need to take into account the reliability of the identity authentication mechanism, as well as netizens' perceptions of privacy about their identity and the necessity of guaranteeing content and information reliability online. We also offer some suggestions for future research, with a special emphasis on applicability to different cultures, contexts, and social networking sites.

The Relationship between Intimate Partner Violence and Online Help-Seeking: A Moderated Mediation Model of Emotion Dysregulation and Perceived Anonymity

“…The perception of anonymity refers to the indiscernibility of the identity of the user, or that one cannot be tracked in cyberspace [ 20 ]. Therefore, PA has a positive effect on self-disclosure [ 19 ].…”

“…The anonymity associated with the online environment means it may be seen to offer greater levels of privacy and increased security, which may encourage self-disclosure [ 20 ]. The perception of anonymity refers to the indiscernibility of the identity of the user, or that one cannot be tracked in cyberspace [ 39 ].…”

Measuring Romanian Students’ Attitude towards the Ethical Use of Social Networks

“…According to data obtained by Chandra [11], unethical acts on social networks have a negative impact on the individual's health, due to the lack of ability to make correct decisions. Chen et al [24] investigated how hiding and revealing the individuals' real identity in cyber space affects the users' engagement in moral vigilance. The study data demonstrate that perceived risk encourages the participation of users in discussions about moral/ethical violation topics.…”

“…Froment et al [32] believe that it is important for teachers to always maintain confidentiality and avoid behaviors which might breach the students' privacy when interacting via social networks. Network identity policies [24] will be established at the academic level to comply with the reliability of the user authentication mechanisms, as well as the user's privacy perception.…”

The dark side of digitalization and social media platform governance: a citizen engagement study

“…In a similar vein, ethical governance deals with moral principles around how people should act and set rules for judging "right" from "wrong". This centers on ideals around how society should govern itself beyond formal institutions, rules and processes by empowering individuals to monitor and condemn immoral behaviors that violate principles such as privacy and fairness (Chen et al, 2020;Molas-Gallart, 2012). Inclusive governance, meanwhile, aims to close the gap between scientists and citizens by promoting equitable, open and transparent collaboration through citizen engagement (Lukyanenko et al, 2020).…”