2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability of soft tissue constitutive parameters from in-vivo macro-indentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus subject-specific data were not required in this case. Constitutive behaviours defined from in vivo indentation tests were not used in the current study since these results may be biased by the modelling simplifications and the resulting identifiability parameter set may not be satisfying (Oddes and Solav, 2023). Further work will seek to address subject-specific material parameters, bulk modulus included, from inverse FE using MRI data such as tissue displacement and strain fields (Trebbi et al, 2022) and soft-tissue volume changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus subject-specific data were not required in this case. Constitutive behaviours defined from in vivo indentation tests were not used in the current study since these results may be biased by the modelling simplifications and the resulting identifiability parameter set may not be satisfying (Oddes and Solav, 2023). Further work will seek to address subject-specific material parameters, bulk modulus included, from inverse FE using MRI data such as tissue displacement and strain fields (Trebbi et al, 2022) and soft-tissue volume changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the inverse FEA of an axisymmetric indentation test, we utilized the framework indentify (https://github.com/SolavLab/ indentify, v1.0.1) developed and made available by Oddes and Solav (2023) and adapted it to our needs. For pre-and postprocessing of the simulations, running in the FE solver FEBio v4.3 (Maas et al, 2012), we used MATLAB R2022b with the open-source toolbox GIBBON (Moerman, 2018).…”
Section: Axisymmetric Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction between indenter tip and cylinder surface was omitted with a friction coefficient of zero using FEBio's sliding-elastic contact formulation. To reduce simulation time, only a cylinder sector of 2 °(Figure 6A) was solved with the meshing characteristics and boundary conditions described in detail by Oddes and Solav (2023).…”
Section: Axisymmetric Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations