1996
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(96)00859-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifiability of competitive intermolecular three-state excited-state processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the first identifiability study of an intermolecular twostate excited-state process, 12 identification studies of a broad range of models of intermolecular and intramolecular twostate and three-state excited-state processes have been reported [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (see ref. 25 and 26 for supplementary literature data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first identifiability study of an intermolecular twostate excited-state process, 12 identification studies of a broad range of models of intermolecular and intramolecular twostate and three-state excited-state processes have been reported [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (see ref. 25 and 26 for supplementary literature data).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifiability analyses of compartmental models for excited-state processes have only rather recently been reported. We have done extensive studies of the deterministic identifiability of a whole range of compartmental models with time-invariant rate constants for intermolecular as well as intramolecular two-state and three-state excited-state processes in the presence and absence of added quencher. For the linear, time-invariant models, the parameters to be identified are rate constants and spectral parameters related to absorption and emission. For models with transients, we have shown that transient effects change the identifiability criteria compared to the models with time-invariant rate coefficients …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although identifiability analyses have been extensively used in biomedicine, pharmacology, ecology, and engineering, 1,2 their use in photophysics is of recent vintage. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] We have reported on the deterministic identifiability of inter-and intramolecular two-state and three-state excited-state processes in the presence and absence of added quencher. 3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] For the linear, timeinvariant models that we considered, the parameters to be identified are rate constants and spectral parameters related to absorption (the excited-state species concentrations at time zero) and emission (the emission weighting factors).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] We have reported on the deterministic identifiability of inter-and intramolecular two-state and three-state excited-state processes in the presence and absence of added quencher. 3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] For the linear, timeinvariant models that we considered, the parameters to be identified are rate constants and spectral parameters related to absorption (the excited-state species concentrations at time zero) and emission (the emission weighting factors). It was found that some excited-state processes are uniquely identifiable, others are only locally identifiable, and still others are unidentifiable without prior knowledge of some of the system parameters; for example, for intramolecular two-state excited-state processes in the presence of added quencher it is possible to determine only bounds on the rate constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation