2017
DOI: 10.1101/gr.213256.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identical bacterial populations colonize premature infant gut, skin, and oral microbiomes and exhibit different in situ growth rates

Abstract: The initial microbiome impacts the health and future development of premature infants. Methodological limitations have led to gaps in our understanding of the habitat range and subpopulation complexity of founding strains, as well as how different body sites support microbial growth. Here, we used metagenomics to reconstruct genomes of strains that colonized the skin, mouth, and gut of two hospitalized premature infants during the first month of life. Seven bacterial populations, considered to be identical giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
94
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(90 reference statements)
10
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no topical side effects were observed, the broad antimicrobial activity of octenidin and mupirocin used in our studies might alter the microbiome towards a more harmful bacterial composition. The skin of premature infants appears to be colonized with identical bacterial strains within the first month of life, showing a close relationship of the oral, skin, and gut microbiome [21]. Hence, the impact of decolonization strategies on the skin microbiome of premature neonates is unknown but could potentially lead to dysbiosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although no topical side effects were observed, the broad antimicrobial activity of octenidin and mupirocin used in our studies might alter the microbiome towards a more harmful bacterial composition. The skin of premature infants appears to be colonized with identical bacterial strains within the first month of life, showing a close relationship of the oral, skin, and gut microbiome [21]. Hence, the impact of decolonization strategies on the skin microbiome of premature neonates is unknown but could potentially lead to dysbiosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are scarce data on the composition of the neonatal microbiome, as well as its relationship to common neonatal skin conditions. Existing studies are limited by small sample size and lack of controls . Herein, we summarize the existing literature on the infantile cutaneous microbiome, its relation to normal skin barrier development, and its contribution to three common skin conditions: AD, seborrheic dermatitis (SD), and erythema toxicum neonatorum (ETN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-situ replication rate was inferred based on the sequencing coverage trend that results from bi-directional genome replication from a single origin of replication using iRep (Brown et al, 2016). The presence of TsSOB in the two un-binned sponge samples as well as in the seawater sample was determined by calculate_breadth.py, a python script which calculates the breadth and coverage of the genome according to the mapped reads from each of the metagenomic samples (Olm et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sequence Analysis Annotation and Assemblymentioning
confidence: 99%