“…In so doing, they testify to the need for careful observation and exact description of what phenomenological philosopher Husserl (1983) spoke of as ''the things themselves'' (p. 35), thus, to the importance not of giving meticulous attention to behavior or to what so many present-day researchers call ''embodied actions,'' and some, in ignorance of their tautology, call ''embodied movement'' (Gibbs, 2006;Varela & Depraz, 2005), but of giving meticulous attention and precise descriptions of the actual movement of living creatures, to morphologies-in-motion. What such attention and descriptions point to are the manifold ways in which what I term synergies of meaningful movement are part and parcel of the repertoire of all animate forms, synergies by which one individual effectively communicates with another, for example, or synergies by which one individual effectively responds to another, as in prey/ predator relations.…”