2011
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511842177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideas, Interests and Foreign Aid

Abstract: Why do countries give foreign aid? Although many countries have official development assistance programs, this book argues that no two of them see the purpose of these programmes in the same way. Moreover, the way countries frame that purpose has shaped aid policy choices past and present. The author examines how Belgium long gave aid out of a sense of obligation to its former colonies, The Netherlands was more interested in pursuing international influence, Italy has focused on the reputational payoffs of aid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceptions mostly concern articles focusing on countries in central and eastern Europe in the context of their accession process (Lightfoot, 2010;Horký, 2012;Lightfoot & Szent-Ivanyi, 2014;Timofejevs Henriksson, 2015), or book chapters that provide explorative overviews without engaging in in-depth theoretical or empirical analysis (Bretherton, 2013;Orbie & Lightfoot, 2015). Moreover, while the development policies of European donors have been studied extensively (Hoebink & Stokke, 2005;Lancaster, 2007;Van der Veen, 2011;Lundsgaarde, 2012), the potential relevance of EU membership and Europeanisation tendencies have been ignored. There is also the growing strand of literature on the Europeanisation of foreign policy (Tonra, 2001;Major, 2005;Moumoutzis, 2011;Wong & Hill, 2011;De Flers & Müller, 2012), but no consistent conclusions have been reached: 'each study claiming that a member state's foreign policy has been Europeanised is challenged by another claiming that it has not' (Wong, 2011, p. 163).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions mostly concern articles focusing on countries in central and eastern Europe in the context of their accession process (Lightfoot, 2010;Horký, 2012;Lightfoot & Szent-Ivanyi, 2014;Timofejevs Henriksson, 2015), or book chapters that provide explorative overviews without engaging in in-depth theoretical or empirical analysis (Bretherton, 2013;Orbie & Lightfoot, 2015). Moreover, while the development policies of European donors have been studied extensively (Hoebink & Stokke, 2005;Lancaster, 2007;Van der Veen, 2011;Lundsgaarde, 2012), the potential relevance of EU membership and Europeanisation tendencies have been ignored. There is also the growing strand of literature on the Europeanisation of foreign policy (Tonra, 2001;Major, 2005;Moumoutzis, 2011;Wong & Hill, 2011;De Flers & Müller, 2012), but no consistent conclusions have been reached: 'each study claiming that a member state's foreign policy has been Europeanised is challenged by another claiming that it has not' (Wong, 2011, p. 163).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category aims to capture the motives of development assistance. A lot has been written on what motivates development assistance (Alesina & Dollar, ; Hook, ; Lancaster, ; McGillivray, ; Morgenthau, ; Riddell, ; Van der Veen, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, 'aid model' refers to the institutionalized orientation of aid policies and institutions that are specific to an individual donor (Kondoh 2012: 82). Extensive case studies on western donor governments and societies conclude that such aid models are crystalized by particular prioritization and are relevant to the extent and the mix of aid purposes (Lancaster 2008;Schraeder et al 1998;Van der Veen 2011).…”
Section: Setting the Scene: Old And New Trends Of Aid Model Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%