2009
DOI: 10.1080/09557570903103992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideas and interests in global financial governance: comparing German and US preference formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with the independent variables, the question arose in the FTAA and DS267 case studies of whether the more diffuse methods available to domestic actors to transmit ideational preferences to government actors-for example, through public opinion polls or socialization processes-necessarily meant government actors are likely to be less responsive to these preferences than they are to domestic interests, which are transmitted through the more direct lobbying processes. Under this argument, when interest groups are directly impacted by a potential government policy and face potential costs as a part of that policy, their higher levels of lobbying mean interests, rather than ideas, are likely to play the primary role in the policymaking situation (Schirm 2009). The cross-case study evidence from this chapter, however, does not support this claim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Starting with the independent variables, the question arose in the FTAA and DS267 case studies of whether the more diffuse methods available to domestic actors to transmit ideational preferences to government actors-for example, through public opinion polls or socialization processes-necessarily meant government actors are likely to be less responsive to these preferences than they are to domestic interests, which are transmitted through the more direct lobbying processes. Under this argument, when interest groups are directly impacted by a potential government policy and face potential costs as a part of that policy, their higher levels of lobbying mean interests, rather than ideas, are likely to play the primary role in the policymaking situation (Schirm 2009). The cross-case study evidence from this chapter, however, does not support this claim.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, perhaps when faced with an overwhelming amount of the former-as was the case throughout the FTAA negotiations-the effectiveness of the latter in conveying preferences to the government was diminished. This would provide new support for arguments in the literature which claim ideas play a decisive role in decision-making only when domestic interests are diffusely affected by the policy under discussion (Schirm 2009). This explanation will be kept in mind throughout the case studies that follow and addressed again in the discussion section at the end of the next chapter.…”
Section: Foreign Minister Celsomentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations