2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1678628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideal Types and the Problem of Reification (Hypostatization)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although originally there seems to have been a realisation that the unconscious (mind) was an explanatory concept and not a physical entity, a process of reification soon took place through which the unconscious (mind) came to be treated as if it were a semi-concrete 'thing', a physical storehouse or receptacle. This is a process in which descriptive concepts get treated as if they were entities with particular characteristics (Eidlin, 2006), a process which has been widely criticised in the past by such authorities as Bateson (1972;Charlton, 2008), Dell (1982) and Sarbin and Coe (1972), and more recently by Heap, Aravind, Hartland and Waxman (2002). The British mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead (1927/1970Griffin, 1998) was known for his criticism of reification as the 'fallacy of misplaced concreteness' (Whitehead, 1927(Whitehead, /1970; and Wikipedia (Reification, n.d.) says reification occurs '… when an abstraction is treated as if it were a concrete, real event or physical entity'.…”
Section: The Dichotomy Between Conscious and Unconscious Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally there seems to have been a realisation that the unconscious (mind) was an explanatory concept and not a physical entity, a process of reification soon took place through which the unconscious (mind) came to be treated as if it were a semi-concrete 'thing', a physical storehouse or receptacle. This is a process in which descriptive concepts get treated as if they were entities with particular characteristics (Eidlin, 2006), a process which has been widely criticised in the past by such authorities as Bateson (1972;Charlton, 2008), Dell (1982) and Sarbin and Coe (1972), and more recently by Heap, Aravind, Hartland and Waxman (2002). The British mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead (1927/1970Griffin, 1998) was known for his criticism of reification as the 'fallacy of misplaced concreteness' (Whitehead, 1927(Whitehead, /1970; and Wikipedia (Reification, n.d.) says reification occurs '… when an abstraction is treated as if it were a concrete, real event or physical entity'.…”
Section: The Dichotomy Between Conscious and Unconscious Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work drew criticism instantly from historians, however, for the way in which it imputed causal relationships between the emergence of a mode of religious thought and economics, its loose use of notions such as 'protestant ethic' and 'capitalist spirit', as well as the veracity of its analysis of the religious details of Protestantism (Gannon, 2002-3). Eidin (2005) believes that the concept involves a form of reification that encourages a confusion between the description of the ideal-type and objective reality. Such constructs may provide tools for analysing evidence, but they may also prompt researchers to ignore ostensibly contradictory or aberrant data, contravening Bourdieu's (1990) injunction that any pretension to establishing 'truth' must account for all of the facts in a completely coherent way.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%