2008
DOI: 10.4287/jsprs.47.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideal situation for camera calibration using amateur digital cameras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advanced camera calibration techniques for geometric correction (Kunii and Murai, 2008) were not applied in this experiment. For each band and each camera exposure speed, we converted the camera's output digital count (D, 0 − 255) at the center and 24 off-center points of 10 × 10 pixel to a ratio relative to the D value at the center (= 1.0).…”
Section: Radiometric Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced camera calibration techniques for geometric correction (Kunii and Murai, 2008) were not applied in this experiment. For each band and each camera exposure speed, we converted the camera's output digital count (D, 0 − 255) at the center and 24 off-center points of 10 × 10 pixel to a ratio relative to the D value at the center (= 1.0).…”
Section: Radiometric Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-cost pocket cameras are designed and manufactured mainly for taking snapshots easily, and manufacturers do not usually recommend them for measurement or survey use that requires a high degree of accuracy and stability. Recently, the feasibility of using single-lens refl ex digital cameras for mapping was reported (Kunii and Murai, 2008). In fact, several authors have shown favorable results using color video or still digital cameras, or multiband cameras equipped with a near infrared band-pass fi lter for assessing crop coverage or leaf greenness (e.g., Kawashima and Nakatani, 1998;Adamsen et al, 1999;Purcell, 2000;Zhou and Robson, 2001;Matsuda et al, 2003;Jia et al, 2004;Ku et al, 2004;Casadesus et al, 2007;Omine, 2007;Takemine et al, 2007;Crimmins and Crimmins, 2008;Okada and Ikeba, 2008;Takada et al, 2009;Sakamoto et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%