2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideal cardiovascular health metrics and risk of cardiovascular disease or mortality: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5 These cutpoints were chosen to be consistent with the American Heart Association’s criteria for ideal cardiovascular health. 1719 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 These cutpoints were chosen to be consistent with the American Heart Association’s criteria for ideal cardiovascular health. 1719 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data have indicated that the presence of more ideal CVH metrics is inversely associated with the incidence of CVD, stroke, and mortality . According to a previous meta‐analysis, the aggregated risk estimate derived from 4 studies suggested 75% and 45% markedly lower risks for CV and all‐cause mortality, respectively. Although this meta‐analysis was strongly heterogeneous, it did not further examine the sources of this heterogeneity, such as subgroup analysis and a graph of dose–response relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of deep phenotyping has been demonstrated in studies of common CVDs (6). A natural extension of such studies has been to embrace principles of more precise clinical phenotyping in cardio-oncology.…”
Section: Panomics: Biomarker Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%