Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IdeaBot: Investigating Social Facilitation in Human-Machine Team Creativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this effect was not mediated by evaluation apprehension, nor was the relationship between brainstorming partner and evaluation apprehension moderated by social cue availability. These findings echo those by Geerts et al (2021), but contrast to some extent with related research by Gozzo and de Rooij (2021), where collaboratively generating associations with a general-purpose AI reduced evaluation apprehension; and with Hwang and Won's (2021) finding that generating ideas together with a chatbot led people to suggest that they could express their ideas more freely compared to the participants who thought they collaborated with a human being. One explanation for the latter difference is that free expression may not be the result of reduced evaluation apprehension, but rather of increased behavioral disinhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, this effect was not mediated by evaluation apprehension, nor was the relationship between brainstorming partner and evaluation apprehension moderated by social cue availability. These findings echo those by Geerts et al (2021), but contrast to some extent with related research by Gozzo and de Rooij (2021), where collaboratively generating associations with a general-purpose AI reduced evaluation apprehension; and with Hwang and Won's (2021) finding that generating ideas together with a chatbot led people to suggest that they could express their ideas more freely compared to the participants who thought they collaborated with a human being. One explanation for the latter difference is that free expression may not be the result of reduced evaluation apprehension, but rather of increased behavioral disinhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The finding that people generate more and diverse ideas when they believe they are brainstorming with a chatbot, rather than with a human being, replicate Hwang and Won's (2021) results. The results of the present study, however, add that social cues can be used to enhance the effect of chatbot identity on the generation of diverse ideas, and possibly on the number of ideas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations