2023
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2213614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ide-cel or Standard Regimens in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a phase 1b/2 open‐label study, a single infusion of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) resulted in deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with MM 24 . In yet another study, treatment with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel) CAR‐T therapy led to increased PFS and improved responses in patients with TCE RRMM who received two to four prior standard regimens 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a phase 1b/2 open‐label study, a single infusion of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) resulted in deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with MM 24 . In yet another study, treatment with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide‐cel) CAR‐T therapy led to increased PFS and improved responses in patients with TCE RRMM who received two to four prior standard regimens 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a phase 1b/2open-label study, a single infusion of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (ciltacel) resulted in deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with MM 24. In yet another study, treatment with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR-T therapy led to increased PFS and improved responses in patients with TCE RRMM who received two to four prior standard regimens 25. 5 | CONCLUSIONSDespite developments in therapeutic strategies for MM, patients still face a very poor prognosis after their disease becomes refractory to multiple treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KarMMa-3 is a phase III study that compared the efficacy of ide-cel to standard regimens in 386 RRMM patients who had received 2–4 prior therapies including an IMiD, PI and DARA (triple class exposed) and who had refractory disease to their last regimen. Of these, 66% had triple-class-refractory and 95% DARA-refractory disease [ 141 ]. ORR (71% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), ≥CR rate (39% vs. 5, p < 0.001) and median PFS (13.3 vs. 4.4 months, p < 0.001) were all superior for the ide-cel arm.…”
Section: Available Therapeutic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ORR (71% vs. 42%, p < 0.001), ≥CR rate (39% vs. 5, p < 0.001) and median PFS (13.3 vs. 4.4 months, p < 0.001) were all superior for the ide-cel arm. OS data are not yet mature [ 141 ].…”
Section: Available Therapeutic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the phase 2 KarMMa (NCT03361748) study, treatment with ide-cel led to an unprecedented overall response rate (ORR) of 73% and a median overall survival of 24.8 months in a heavily pretreated patient population with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) [ 14 ]. The randomized phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial (NCT03651128) recently reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) for ide-cel in RRMM compared to standard of care [ 15 ]. The efficacy of cilta-cel is being currently assessed in two first-line phase 3 trials, for patients with newly diagnosed MM, unfit or unwilling to receive treatment consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) (CARTITUDE-5, NCT04923893), and as alternative to ASCT for first line consolidation (CARTITUDE-6, NCT05257083).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%