2015
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2015.0108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

idDock+: Integrating Machine Learning in Probabilistic Search for Protein–Protein Docking

Abstract: Predicting the three-dimensional native structures of protein dimers, a problem known as protein-protein docking, is key to understanding molecular interactions. Docking is a computationally challenging problem due to the diversity of interactions and the high dimensionality of the configuration space. Existing methods draw configurations systematically or at random from the configuration space. The inaccuracy of scoring functions used to evaluate drawn configurations presents additional challenges. Evidence i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning methods, though not the focus of this review, are showing promise in elucidating features of native interaction interfaces so as to bypass the employment of interaction energy functions at a global layer [ 265 – 268 ]. For instance, work in [ 269 ] proposes a learned model to be used as a top filter to label sampled protein-protein dimers before attempting to refine them with more accurate and computationally costly interaction energy functions. Rather than employing information from machine learning models, methods such as HADDOCK [ 243 ], the Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) [ 270 ] and others [ 271 , 272 ], employ wet-laboratory data to restrict sampling of bound conformations to those that reproduce the wet-laboratory data.…”
Section: Recent Applications Made Possible By Hardware and Algorithmimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning methods, though not the focus of this review, are showing promise in elucidating features of native interaction interfaces so as to bypass the employment of interaction energy functions at a global layer [ 265 – 268 ]. For instance, work in [ 269 ] proposes a learned model to be used as a top filter to label sampled protein-protein dimers before attempting to refine them with more accurate and computationally costly interaction energy functions. Rather than employing information from machine learning models, methods such as HADDOCK [ 243 ], the Integrative Modeling Platform (IMP) [ 270 ] and others [ 271 , 272 ], employ wet-laboratory data to restrict sampling of bound conformations to those that reproduce the wet-laboratory data.…”
Section: Recent Applications Made Possible By Hardware and Algorithmimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EAs are investigated in detail in our lab in diverse protein modeling scenarios, including de novo structure prediction [74][75][76] and protein-protein docking. [77][78][79] The EA we employ here has been recently proposed 9,10 to further populate the structure space of a protein for which many experimental structures already exist in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). 80 A detailed analysis of the energy landscapes obtained from the algorithm on various H-Ras sequences has also been published recently.…”
Section: Stage I: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%