2012
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-s1-s9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDDI: integrated domain-domain interaction and protein interaction analysis system

Abstract: BackgroundDeciphering protein-protein interaction (PPI) in domain level enriches valuable information about binding mechanism and functional role of interacting proteins. The 3D structures of complex proteins are reliable source of domain-domain interaction (DDI) but the number of proven structures is very limited. Several resources for the computationally predicted DDI have been generated but they are scattered in various places and their prediction show erratic performances. A well-organized PPI and DDI anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amino acid sequences of non-redundant preliminary PPIs were extracted and domains were assigned to them using Pfam version 27.0 62 . The list of non-redundant domain-domain interactions was prepared from the meta-databases Domine 63 , DIMA 3.0 64 and IDDI database 65 . These use complexes available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) 66 to identify by interacting domains the Pfam families containing these domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid sequences of non-redundant preliminary PPIs were extracted and domains were assigned to them using Pfam version 27.0 62 . The list of non-redundant domain-domain interactions was prepared from the meta-databases Domine 63 , DIMA 3.0 64 and IDDI database 65 . These use complexes available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) 66 to identify by interacting domains the Pfam families containing these domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the prediction of functional associations between genes in humans, we selected six types of evidence, which were collected from seven public databases for the years prior to 2018, including 22,004 expression pro les (Coxpresdb) [12], 288,375 gene annotations (GOC) [13], 59,617 subcellular gene localizations (Compartments) [14], 156,859 domain interactions (IDDI [15] and Pfam [16]), 20,567 phylogenetic pro les (DIOPT) [17] , and 9,220 human proteins and proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe used to compute interologs (Inparanoid) [18] (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Data Integration For the Prediction Of Functional Associatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein domain information were taken from the Pfam database [10]. PPI and DDI data were collected from integrated PPI database [11] and integrated DDI database (IDDI) [12] respectively. Moreover, we downloaded the protein complex datasets from COFECO [13].…”
Section: Collection Of Interactome Datamentioning
confidence: 99%