2022
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idasanutlin Plus Cytarabine in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of the MIRROS Trial

Abstract: The phase III MIRROS trial (NCT02545283) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the small-molecule MDM2 antagonist idasanutlin plus cytarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). Adults (N=447) with R/R AML whose disease relapsed or was refractory after ≤2 prior induction regimens as initial treatment or following salvage chemotherapy regimen, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 were enrolled regardless of TP53 mutation status and randomly assigned 2:1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a phase III clinical trial (MIRROS) of idasanutlin together with cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory AML 79 did not meet its primary point of superiority over cytarabine plus placebo. Specifically, despite an improved overall response rate, adding idasanutlin to cytarabine did not improve OS or complete response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory AML 80 . Similarly, idasanutlin showed encouraging clinical effects in a phase I clinical trial in patients with polycythaemia vera 81 , but haematological and low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity led to frequent discontinuation of the drug in a subsequent phase II trial 82 .…”
Section: Small Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, a phase III clinical trial (MIRROS) of idasanutlin together with cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory AML 79 did not meet its primary point of superiority over cytarabine plus placebo. Specifically, despite an improved overall response rate, adding idasanutlin to cytarabine did not improve OS or complete response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory AML 80 . Similarly, idasanutlin showed encouraging clinical effects in a phase I clinical trial in patients with polycythaemia vera 81 , but haematological and low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity led to frequent discontinuation of the drug in a subsequent phase II trial 82 .…”
Section: Small Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…CDK4 amplification resulted in high MDM2 expression regardless of MDM2 amplification in MET ex14, and this finding could suggest CDK4 as an important regulator of MDM2 . Both MDM2 inhibitors and CDK4/6 inhibitors have antitumor activity in alternate tumor types when combined with chemotherapy, 38 targeted therapy, 39 , 40 and hormonal therapy, 41 and reveal potential novel combination treatment strategies with MET TKI in MET ex14 patients with MDM2 or CDK4 co-amplification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation of dynamic P53/P63 motif-containing TREs and chromatin accessibility features identified in our study may delineate the specific factors responsible for these multiple P53/P63 roles and determine how signal-dependent responses integrate with lineage factors in determining airway epithelia response to exposures. Finally, increasing P53 activity via agents such as idasanutlin (50), which is currently in clinical development for myeloid cancers (51), is feasible and may provide another therapeutic avenue in DRRD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%