ICU physicians’ and internists’ survival predictions for patients evaluated for admission to the intensive care unit

Abstract

BackgroundA higher chance of survival is a key justification for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). This implies that physicians should be able to accurately estimate a patient’s prognosis, whether cared for on the ward or in the ICU. We aimed to determine whether physicians’ survival predictions correlate with the admission decisions and with patients’ observed survival. Consecutive ICU consultations for internal medicine patients were included. The ICU physician and the internist were asked to predict patient survival with intensive care and with care on the ward using 5 categories of probabilities (< 10%, 10–40%, 41–60%, 61–90%, > 90%). Patient mortality at 28 days was recorded.ResultsThirty ICU physicians and 97 internists assessed 201 patients for intensive care. Among the patients, 140 (69.7%) were admitted to the ICU. Fifty-eight (28.9%) died within 28 days. Admission to intensive care was associated with predicted survival gain in the ICU, particularly for survival estimates made by ICU physicians. Observed survival was associated with predicted survival, for both groups of physicians. The discrimination of the predictions for survival with intensive care, measured by the area under the ROC curve, was 0.63 for ICU physicians and 0.76 for internists; for survival on the ward the areas under the ROC curves were 0.69 and 0.74, respectively.ConclusionsPhysicians are able to predict survival probabilities when they assess patients for intensive care, albeit imperfectly. Internists are more accurate than ICU physicians. However, ICU physicians’ estimates more strongly influence the admission decision. Closer collaboration between ICU physicians and internists is needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-018-0456-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Factors associated with survival of patients with solid Cancer alive after intensive care unit discharge between 2005 and 2013

“…This is an issue facing intensive care physicians, both in terms of the ICU admission of these patients, as well as their management. These patients represent 15–20% of all ICU admissions [ 5 – 8 ]. Despite therapeutic improvements for cancer patients, an ICU admission is still associated with a very poor medium-term prognosis [ 9 , 10 ].…”

Retrospective clinical study of tracheostomy among intubated patients of respiratory intensive care unit

“…Higher chance of survival is the key justification for RICU admission. 17 Hence treating doctor should be able to assess the conditional survival of the patients. Conditional survival implies probability of future survival of the patient after a defined period of treatment.…”

Age discrimination in critical care triage in South Africa: The law and the allocation of scarce health resources in the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Intensive care units (ICUs) function at close to maximum capacity at the best of times, around 80% and 50% in the public and private sectors, respectively. [8] Predicting ICU mortality and 6-month survival odds to determine who would benefit most from admission to an ICU during triage, frontline physicians, nurses [9] and internists [10] beat objective score-based systems consistently. [11] Yet it is score-based protocols such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) that are routinely used to justify the exclusion of entire categories of patients from ICUs.…”