2019
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2019.1690075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICTs for Accessing, Understanding and Safeguarding Cultural Heritage: The Experience of INCEPTION and ROCK H2020 Projects

Abstract: The terms and conditions for the reuse of this version of the manuscript are specified in the publishing policy. For all terms of use and more information see the publisher's website.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, a significant literature has been produced documenting the state of the art on this subject (Logothetis et al, 2015;Dore, Murphy, 2017): existing and ongoing studies prove the need to make this technology perfectible by updating and adapting it to the features of built heritage in order to meet specific programmatic objectives. Over the years, some research projects have been focused on optimizing modeling times (Biagini et al, 2016), integrating data from laser scanner survey into BIM also by the creation of parametric objects directly from the 3D point cloud, on defining the most suitable levels of accuracy of the parametric model and characterizing it with data related to materials, construction techniques and stratigraphy (Garagnani, Manferdini, 2013;Spallone et al, 2016;Malinverni et al, 2019), on testing the possibilities for a new storytelling (Di Giulio et al, 2019;Banfi, Oreni, 2020) and, last but not least, on building adequate forms of semantic enrichment both on an architectural and urban scale through the use of ontologies and geographic information systems (Quattrini et al, 2017;Chiabrando et al, 2018;Acierno, Fiorani, 2019;Simeone et al, 2019). Compared to the aim of this paper, the most interesting researches are those which have tried to overcome the idea of HBIM as a simple repository of complex data, conceiving it rather as «a hub for supporting integrated documentation of heritage artefacts» (Simeon et al, 2019).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a significant literature has been produced documenting the state of the art on this subject (Logothetis et al, 2015;Dore, Murphy, 2017): existing and ongoing studies prove the need to make this technology perfectible by updating and adapting it to the features of built heritage in order to meet specific programmatic objectives. Over the years, some research projects have been focused on optimizing modeling times (Biagini et al, 2016), integrating data from laser scanner survey into BIM also by the creation of parametric objects directly from the 3D point cloud, on defining the most suitable levels of accuracy of the parametric model and characterizing it with data related to materials, construction techniques and stratigraphy (Garagnani, Manferdini, 2013;Spallone et al, 2016;Malinverni et al, 2019), on testing the possibilities for a new storytelling (Di Giulio et al, 2019;Banfi, Oreni, 2020) and, last but not least, on building adequate forms of semantic enrichment both on an architectural and urban scale through the use of ontologies and geographic information systems (Quattrini et al, 2017;Chiabrando et al, 2018;Acierno, Fiorani, 2019;Simeone et al, 2019). Compared to the aim of this paper, the most interesting researches are those which have tried to overcome the idea of HBIM as a simple repository of complex data, conceiving it rather as «a hub for supporting integrated documentation of heritage artefacts» (Simeon et al, 2019).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a need for the public for facilities to access and better understand the tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage. Information communication technology (ICT) offers wide accessibility, and it not only allows the user to acquire information about each object as a single, isolated element, but also to view it as part of a broader context, which can help him or her to better understand the whole history of the cultural heritage [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the rapid development and adoption of digital technology has provided opportunities to resolve this bottleneck. Remote sensing, geographic information systems (GIS), and virtual reality (VR) have been widely used in cultural heritage protection [2], bringing about a new wave of technological revolution in the protection and utilization of cultural heritage with 3D reconstruction, virtual restoration, and digital display at the core [3]. The documentation and inheritance of cultural significance, as one of the major Buildings 2022, 12, 977 2 of 15 challenges in the field of heritage conservation, is essential in the design of preventive conservation strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%