2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICSM: An order method for calculating electrostatic interactions added to TINKER

Abstract: We present an order N method for calculating electrostatic interactions that has been integrated into the molecular dynamics portion of the TINKER Molecular Modeling package. This method, introduced in a previous paper [J. Chem. Phys. 131 (2009) 154103] and termed the Image-Charge Solvation Model (ICSM), is a hybrid electrostatic approach that combines the strengths of both explicit and implicit representations of the solvent. A multiple-image method is used to calculate reaction fields due to the implicit par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, alternatives to continuum implicit solvent models exist, mainly in the form of hybrid models and molecular integral equation approaches, most prominently 3D‐reference site interaction models (RISMs), that more naturally avoid many of the assumptions of continuum approaches. While these have generally been too slow to provide much advantage over explicit models in the context of simulation, recent advances in hybrid models (both in the traditional explicit‐continuum implicit methods and in lattice methods) and in 3D‐RISMs are making them viable alternatives …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, alternatives to continuum implicit solvent models exist, mainly in the form of hybrid models and molecular integral equation approaches, most prominently 3D‐reference site interaction models (RISMs), that more naturally avoid many of the assumptions of continuum approaches. While these have generally been too slow to provide much advantage over explicit models in the context of simulation, recent advances in hybrid models (both in the traditional explicit‐continuum implicit methods and in lattice methods) and in 3D‐RISMs are making them viable alternatives …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, while the ICSM/GICSM has a better asymptotic computational complexity O ( N ) than the O ( N log N ) complexity of the PME, when used to simulate homogeneous systems of relatively small sizes, the PME was found significantly more efficient. However, in a separate project [29], we also found that, when integrated into TINKER [30], the ICSM becomes computationally more efficient than the PME built into TINKER when 30,000 or more explicit atoms are included in the simulated system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the principle of superposition, we only need to consider the case of one single source charge in V in , i.e. ρ in (r) = qδ(r−r s ), and the total potential can be written as Φ = Φ S +Φ RF where Φ RF is the primary field that results from the source charge q at r s and Φ RF is the reaction field from the exterior dielectric medium with dielectric constant ε o and the inverse Debye-H ückel screening length λ = 0, respectively [1,24]. The reaction field can be approximated by a set of discrete image charges based on Gauss-Radau quadratures as [5]:…”
Section: Icsm -Image Charge Solvation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%