This paper provides a look at how modulated broad-band noises modulate the thalamic response evoked by brief probe sounds in the awake animal. We demonstrate that noise not only attenuates the response to probe sounds (masking) but also changes the temporal response pattern (scrambling). Two brief probe sounds, a Gaussian noise burst and a brief sinusoidal tone, were presented in silence and in three ongoing noises. The three noises were targeted at activating the auditory system in qualitatively distinct ways. Dynamic ripple noise, containing many random tone-like elements, is targeted at those parts of the auditory system that respond well to tones. International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology noise, comprised of the sum of several simultaneous streams of Schroeder-phase speech, is targeted at those parts of the auditory system that respond well to modulated sounds but lack a well defined response to tones. Gaussian noise is targeted at those parts of the auditory system that respond to acoustic energy regardless of modulation. All noises both attenuated and decreased the precise temporal repeatability of the onset response to probe sounds. In addition, the modulated noises induced contextspecific changes in the temporal pattern of the response to probe sounds. Scrambling of the temporal response pattern may be a direct neural correlate of the unfortunate experience of being able to hear, but not understand, speech sounds in noisy environments.T his paper examines how neurons in the auditory thalamus [medial geniculate body (MGB)] of awake rats respond to transient probe sounds in silence and in the presence of three ongoing noises. We demonstrate that noise changes not only probe response magnitude but also changes the temporal pattern of the probe-evoked response.The unwanted acoustic interference in natural listening situations is more closely modeled by modulated noise than by Gaussian, pink noise. This situation forces audiologists to employ complex noises, such as multispeaker ''babble,'' to predict the ability of hearing-aid users to comprehend speech in noisy environments. This study selected two complementary noises from the vast space of possible modulated noises. One noise was derived from a standardized babble noise developed by the International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) (1). The noise contains speech-like temporal modulations but without the narrow-band, tone-like elements of speech. Complementing the ICRA-derived noise is dynamic-ripple noise (DRN) (2), which was originally conceived as an aid to study responses of auditory neurons by the white-noise system identification approach (3). DRN presents many combinations of tone-like elements in a random order. Together, these noises should randomly stimulate parts of the auditory system that respond quite selectively to tones within a relatively narrow frequency range and parts of the auditory system that respond better to broad-band sounds.This study focused on the MGB because, in anesthetized animals, thalamic neurons res...