1983
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(83)90022-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICPEMC publication no. 8 polygenic effects and genetic changes affecting quantitative traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…body weight at 67 weeks) than genotype-related ones deserves attention. Variations of multifactorial quantitative traits like those we evaluated, whether spontaneous or experimental, are often moderate (Ramel, 1983;Vogel and Motulski, 1997). Thus, the pattern of the cryopreservation-related differences was compatible with the hypothesis of slight and probably heterogenous alterations of intrinsic developmental determinants.…”
Section: Size Of the Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…body weight at 67 weeks) than genotype-related ones deserves attention. Variations of multifactorial quantitative traits like those we evaluated, whether spontaneous or experimental, are often moderate (Ramel, 1983;Vogel and Motulski, 1997). Thus, the pattern of the cryopreservation-related differences was compatible with the hypothesis of slight and probably heterogenous alterations of intrinsic developmental determinants.…”
Section: Size Of the Differencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is at least one reason for such high genetic vulnerability in the brain in that it is the most polygenetically determined organ [65]. We know in fact that damage to polygenic groups is much more frequent than pinpoint mutations and that it causes, as shown in the drosophila, some slight changes in the phenotype which alter some types of function but which are compatible with life [ 66].…”
Section: Paternal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assay systems often used in mutation research focus on standard genetic endpoints, ie, point mutations with major and discrete effects and chromosomal ab.err.ations. However, when considering mutations affecting the polygenic systems of fitness characters, quantitative genetic analysis can contribute important information to the understanding of these mechanisms (see eg Ramel, 1983).…”
Section: Introduction ' 'mentioning
confidence: 99%