1998
DOI: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICP-MS and ICP-OES Studies of Gold from a Late Sarmatian Burial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), and anodic stripping voltammetry [8] have been used for detection of gold ions and AuNPs. The fluorescence-analysis method is advantageous due to the simplicity in operation and the high sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), and anodic stripping voltammetry [8] have been used for detection of gold ions and AuNPs. The fluorescence-analysis method is advantageous due to the simplicity in operation and the high sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copper and silver are the major metallic impurities in native gold and most gold ores (Boyle, 1987;Hall et al, 1998;Pohl, 1992). In general, the silver concentration in ancient gold objects from Europe is within 4 to 45% (Hauptmann et al, 2010;Kulef et al, 2009;Pantazis et al, 2003) with the most common concentrations of about 12-14% Ag (Hauptmann et al, 2010;Pantazis et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) is an analytical technique that is becoming increasingly popular for determining the provenance of materials found in archaeological contexts (Tykot and Young 1996; Young et al 1997; Hall et al 1998; Mallory‐Greenough et al 1998, 1999; Pingitore et al 1998; Tykot 1998; Bentley 2000; Kennett et al 2001, 2002; Speakman and Neff 2002; Neff 2003). The potential advantages of ICP–MS compared to other techniques include: (1) the ability to analyse small samples, thus making it a less destructive technique (particularly when coupled with laser ablation); (2) more target analytes (~70); (3) lower detection limits (parts per billion) on more elements relative to other techniques; (4) the possibility of measuring the isotopic ratios of some elements; and (5) a lower cost per sample, particularly compared to INAA (see Tykot and Young 1996; Kennett et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%