2024
DOI: 10.16995/glossa.10666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iconicity as the motivation for the signification and locality of deictic grammatical tones in Tal

Samuel Kayode Akinbo,
Michael Bulkaam

Abstract: We present novel evidence for iconicity in core morphophonological grammar by documenting, describing, and analysing two patterns of tonal alternation in Tal (West Chadic, Nigeria). When a non-proximal deixis modifies a noun in Tal, every tone of the modified noun is lowered. When the nominal modifier is a proximal deixis, the final tone of the modified noun is raised. The tone lowering and raising are considered the effects of non-proximal and proximal linkers, which have the tone features [–Upper, –Raised] a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, here we focus on cross-linguistic attestation because we aim to predict guesses and ratings of ideophone meanings from a bunch of languages by nonspeakers of those languages. One consequence is that we chose not to focus on form or meaning features that applied to only some of the languages in our sample, even if we were aware of their relevance -as for instance tone in West-African languages (Westermann, 1927;Akinbo & Bulkaam, 2024) and subtle vowel alternations in Korean (Kim, 1977;Kwon, 2018). If instead one wanted to explain or predict first language acquisition in, say, Japanese, then it would make sense to derive cumulative iconicity from a more detailed and partially language-specific coding scheme (e.g., one based on insights from Hamano, 1998); the prediction would be that this would correlate better with, for instance, ratings by native speakers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, here we focus on cross-linguistic attestation because we aim to predict guesses and ratings of ideophone meanings from a bunch of languages by nonspeakers of those languages. One consequence is that we chose not to focus on form or meaning features that applied to only some of the languages in our sample, even if we were aware of their relevance -as for instance tone in West-African languages (Westermann, 1927;Akinbo & Bulkaam, 2024) and subtle vowel alternations in Korean (Kim, 1977;Kwon, 2018). If instead one wanted to explain or predict first language acquisition in, say, Japanese, then it would make sense to derive cumulative iconicity from a more detailed and partially language-specific coding scheme (e.g., one based on insights from Hamano, 1998); the prediction would be that this would correlate better with, for instance, ratings by native speakers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%