1996
DOI: 10.1163/156852996x00757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iconic Space and the Materiality of the Sign1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The halo represents a confirmation of God the Father that the saint is received in the Heavenly Kingdom and it is not a decorative, but an ontological characteristic of the icon. The reference that these halos or crowns of the saints 'are not created things' can be found in the Macarian homilies 2 .…”
Section: Light Drawings and Coloursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The halo represents a confirmation of God the Father that the saint is received in the Heavenly Kingdom and it is not a decorative, but an ontological characteristic of the icon. The reference that these halos or crowns of the saints 'are not created things' can be found in the Macarian homilies 2 .…”
Section: Light Drawings and Coloursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We encounter this idea in the aforementioned example of defenders of Icon veneration. Charles Lock synthesised the arguments of these mentioned authors by paraphrasing St John of Damascus in the following way:
Either accept these [icons], or get rid of those [Gospels] … (Lock, , p. 10).
This idea, that signs that have an obvious degree of conventionality must have a non‐conventional ground in order to be used is not only a central assumption for Peircean semiotics, but also a crucial point for learning, teaching and education in general. Peirce makes this explicit:
… a great distinguishing property of the icon is that by the direct observation of it other truths concerning its object can be discovered than those which suffice to determine its construction.
…”
Section: The Role Of the Icon In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards the underlying causes of the iconoclast controversy, these should not be sought exclusively in external influences but mostly in the inherent character of Byzantine theology. Iconoclasm was not a new phenomenon in Byzantine thought; it seems quite possible that Byzantine imperial Iconoclasm might have been associated with an underlying Neoplatonic negative attitude towards matter in the Byzantine world, as Charles Lock has aptly proposed . The attack on icons was therefore based on a biblically‐articulated Neoplatonism .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%