2011
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeicone.2011.19._icone1943_233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Icone19-43569 Study on Flow Induced Vibration Evaluation for a Large Scale JSFR Piping : (4) Unsteady Flow Characteristics in 1/10 Scale Hot-Leg Piping Experiments Under Undeveloped and Swirl Inflow Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependency on the basic computational meshes are confirmed with the grid convergence index (GCI) referring to ASME V&V (ASME, 2009) as described in Appendix B. In addition, applicability of the present CFD calculation method to flow field evaluation is validated comparing with experimental data obtained in elbows (Iwamoto et al, 2011) as described in Appendix C.…”
Section: Cfd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dependency on the basic computational meshes are confirmed with the grid convergence index (GCI) referring to ASME V&V (ASME, 2009) as described in Appendix B. In addition, applicability of the present CFD calculation method to flow field evaluation is validated comparing with experimental data obtained in elbows (Iwamoto et al, 2011) as described in Appendix C.…”
Section: Cfd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The applicability of the present CFD calculation method to flow field evaluation is validated comparing with experimental data obtained in elbows by Iwamoto et al (2011). Calculation meshes are created with the same concept as described in chapter 2.3.…”
Section: Appendix A: Number Of Pipe Components Counted In Pwr Plantsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The test section was fabricated as 1/3-scaled model of the JSFR hot-leg piping as shown in Fig.1 (b) and diameter of the test section was of 0.41 m. The maximum mean velocity in the experiment was 9.2 m/s which corresponded to that in the operation condition of the JSFR. Iwamoto et al, (3,32) also measured the pressure loss coefficient in 2x10 4 <Re<3.2x10 5 and the axial velocity profiles of water flow with the LDV. The short-elbow pipe test section with diameter of 0.125 m was fabricated as 1/10-scaled model of the JSFR hot-leg piping.…”
Section: Existing Studies For Pipe Elbow Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oncoming streams on both sides collided in the inner wall side region and collision point periodically swayed from side to side from moment to moment. Yuki et al(21) and Iwamoto et al(3) suggested such an unsteady swing motion of the secondary flow in downstream of the elbow by the water experiment. In the inner region (r/D<-0.25), the local acceleration of axial flow and the axial velocity fluctuation intensity as shown in Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%