2007
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeicone.2007.15._icone1510_104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Icone15-10213 Eddy Current Flow Sensor Development and Testing for LMFBR Sodium Pumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure illustrates the polarities at a fixed time in a cycle [3]. If the eddy current flowmeter sensor is placed in a flowing sodium, the induced voltages in the both the secondary are not equal because the induced voltage is subtractive to transformer voltage in upstream secondary coil and additive to transformer voltage in downstream secondary coil hence the resultant voltage is proportional to sodium flow [7,10]. …”
Section: Construction and Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This figure illustrates the polarities at a fixed time in a cycle [3]. If the eddy current flowmeter sensor is placed in a flowing sodium, the induced voltages in the both the secondary are not equal because the induced voltage is subtractive to transformer voltage in upstream secondary coil and additive to transformer voltage in downstream secondary coil hence the resultant voltage is proportional to sodium flow [7,10]. …”
Section: Construction and Working Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the overall average sensitivity of dry test housing was 44% of that in wet test housing. In PFBR the ECFM was subjected to sodium testing in two phases where flow was measured with reference to a permanent magnet flowmeter [7]. In first phase testing the shield material used was Fe-Ni tube and in second phase SS410 tube.…”
Section: A Dry Test and Sodium Loop Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations