2016
DOI: 10.3897/bdj.4.e9559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iCollections – Digitising the British and Irish Butterflies in the Natural History Museum, London

Abstract: BackgroundThe Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK) has embarked on an ambitious programme to digitise its collections . The first phase of this programme has been to undertake a series of pilot projects that will develop the necessary workflows and infrastructure development needed to support mass digitisation of very large scientific collections. This paper presents the results of one of the pilot projects – iCollections. This project digitised all the lepidopteran specimens usually considered as butterflie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used in this study were all derived from the British butterfly collection held at the NHM. Each of the approximately 183 000 British butterfly specimens held in the NHM collections and the associated data labels have been digitally imaged and the data on the labels transcribed to a database, and imported into the NHM collection database KeEMU (Blagoderov et al 2012, Paterson et al 2016. The specimens have all been reliably identified to species by specialist lepidopterists.…”
Section: Butterfly Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in this study were all derived from the British butterfly collection held at the NHM. Each of the approximately 183 000 British butterfly specimens held in the NHM collections and the associated data labels have been digitally imaged and the data on the labels transcribed to a database, and imported into the NHM collection database KeEMU (Blagoderov et al 2012, Paterson et al 2016. The specimens have all been reliably identified to species by specialist lepidopterists.…”
Section: Butterfly Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processed records and corresponding images were ingested into the NHM’s collection management system (CMS), KE EMu (© Axiell), and published through the NHM data portal ( http://data.nhm.ac.uk , Paterson et al 2016b , Paterson et al 2016 ). Flowcharts were prepared using inShort software ver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digitisation of insects currently takes three primary approaches: (1) data capture through direct transcription, without imaging; (2) whole drawer scanning (e.g: Blagoderov et al, 2012;Dietrich et al, 2012;Hudson et al, 2015); and (3) single specimen imaging with label capture (e.g: Paterson et al, 2016;Blagoderov et al, 2017), with or without immediate transcription. Direct transcription is ratelimited by physical access to the collection, and crucially data cannot be checked without examining the specimen labels again.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current single specimen label imaging methods require removal of the labels from the pinned specimen (eg. the iCollections project: Paterson et al, 2016;Blagoderov et al, 2017). This specimen preparation can comprise ~50% of the time taken to digitise each specimen (Blagoderov et al, 2017), increases the specimen handling and thus the risk of specimen damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%