2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ichnofossils and their significance in the Cambrian successions of the Parahio Valley in the Spiti Basin, Tethys Himalaya, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
19
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Description: Series of isolated, slightly curved ridges repeated laterally, moderately spaced from each other; ridges vary in length from 8-10 mm, in width from 1.5-2 mm and are 2-3 mm apart from each other. Remarks: The present specimen differs from Monomorphichnus monolinearis described from Kashmir by Shah and Sudan (1983) and with the species of Monomorphichnus described from Zanskar (Parcha 1998;Parcha and Singh 2010) and Spiti (Parcha and Pandey 2011) in the nature and pattern of the ridges. The present specimens equally differ from Monomorphichnus species described from member A of the Dhaulagiri Formation of the Lesser Himalaya (Tiwari and Parcha 2006), Monomorphicnus lineatus described from Calcareous member of Deo-ka-Tibba and A, B members of Dhaulagiri Formation in Nigalidhar Synform (Desai et al 2010) and from Monomorphichnus isp.…”
Section: Systematic Ichnologycontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Description: Series of isolated, slightly curved ridges repeated laterally, moderately spaced from each other; ridges vary in length from 8-10 mm, in width from 1.5-2 mm and are 2-3 mm apart from each other. Remarks: The present specimen differs from Monomorphichnus monolinearis described from Kashmir by Shah and Sudan (1983) and with the species of Monomorphichnus described from Zanskar (Parcha 1998;Parcha and Singh 2010) and Spiti (Parcha and Pandey 2011) in the nature and pattern of the ridges. The present specimens equally differ from Monomorphichnus species described from member A of the Dhaulagiri Formation of the Lesser Himalaya (Tiwari and Parcha 2006), Monomorphicnus lineatus described from Calcareous member of Deo-ka-Tibba and A, B members of Dhaulagiri Formation in Nigalidhar Synform (Desai et al 2010) and from Monomorphichnus isp.…”
Section: Systematic Ichnologycontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Remarks: The present specimen is grouped under the ichnogenus Diplichnites because of the presence of serial markings and curved nature. The specimen differs with Diplichnites ichnospecies described from the Lesser, Spiti and Zanskar Himalaya in the absence of two parallel, equally spaced rows (Parcha 1998;Tiwari and Parcha 2006;Parcha and Singh 2010;Parcha and Pandey 2011).…”
Section: Systematic Ichnologymentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations