2014
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.892638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora’s box of personal factors

Abstract: A central contribution of the ICF/ICF-CY is the universal language of codes for the components of body structure, body function, activities and participation and Environmental Factors. As such the codes provide taxonomical legitimacy and power for documenting dimensions of functioning and disability in clinical and rehabilitation contexts. As there are no codes of "personal factors", there is no basis for documentation of the component. Demographic information, if needed for identification, should be recorded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personal factors are not specifically coded in the ICF-CY, partly because of the large social and cultural variability associated with them [23,24], but also due to a lack of consensus on how to classify them and what kind of factors that would be appropriate to be included in the nomenclature [25]. However, there have been attempts to classify personal factors into categorical codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal factors are not specifically coded in the ICF-CY, partly because of the large social and cultural variability associated with them [23,24], but also due to a lack of consensus on how to classify them and what kind of factors that would be appropriate to be included in the nomenclature [25]. However, there have been attempts to classify personal factors into categorical codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ICF, personal factors are "contextual factors that relate to the individual such as age, gender, social status, life experiences, and so on" (p. 214) However, personal factors is not classified in the ICF and its purpose in general is controversial (Simeonsson et al, 2014). Nonetheless, personal factors have been recognized as important to optimizing functioning and participation (Rosenbaum and Gorter, 2012).…”
Section: Personal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another criticism of the ICF comes from the lack of classification categories for personal factors (Granlund et al, 2004), and how to operationalize these is a current matter of debate (Geyh et al, 2011;Simeonsson et al, 2014). Hollenweger (2008) however, points out that while the ICF does not currently fully address our understanding of disability in light of the present ways in which it is conceptualized and classified within education systems, the framework is an on-going project likely to run over many years.…”
Section: How Does the Participation Component Of The Icf Provide A Vamentioning
confidence: 99%