2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl082485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice Thickness and Bed Elevation of the Northern and Southern Patagonian Icefields

Abstract: The Northern and Southern Patagonian Icefields are the largest ice masses in the Southern Hemisphere outside Antarctica, but their ice volume and bed topography are poorly known. Here, we combine airborne gravity data collected in 2012 and 2016, with radar data from the Warm Ice Experiment Sounder and Centro de Estudios Científicos's to map bed elevation and ice thickness in great detail. We perform a 3‐D inversion of the gravity data constrained by radar‐derived thickness and fjord bathymetry to infer bed ele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(105 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nearest study object to the Mocho-Choshuenco ice cap is the Northern Patagonian Icefield for which until 2100 an ice mass loss of 592 Gt has been projected under the A1B scenario which is comparable to the RCP6.0 scenario, and therefore between our results for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (Schaefer et al, 2013). Relating this ice loss to more recent estimates of total ice mass (Carrivick et al, 2016;Millan et al, 2019), around 50% of the ice mass would have disappeared. However, these simulations were performed on a fixed geometry, and therefore considered only changes in SMB, making it difficult to compare their results to ours.…”
Section: Global Context Of Glacier Declinesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The nearest study object to the Mocho-Choshuenco ice cap is the Northern Patagonian Icefield for which until 2100 an ice mass loss of 592 Gt has been projected under the A1B scenario which is comparable to the RCP6.0 scenario, and therefore between our results for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (Schaefer et al, 2013). Relating this ice loss to more recent estimates of total ice mass (Carrivick et al, 2016;Millan et al, 2019), around 50% of the ice mass would have disappeared. However, these simulations were performed on a fixed geometry, and therefore considered only changes in SMB, making it difficult to compare their results to ours.…”
Section: Global Context Of Glacier Declinesupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Gravity methods (e.g., Gourlet et al, 2016) offer one option to overcome this limitation as they have no limits in ice thickness determinations, but they need to be validated and controlled by more accurate methods, such as radar. This combined approach has been applied in Patagonia (Millan et al, 2019), resulting in an improved ice thickness distribution coverage and the first comprehensive subglacial topography of the whole NPI and the northern part of the SPI.…”
Section: Recent Glacier Changes and Ice Dynamics In The Wet Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements were extended in 2013 to within a few hundred metres from the glacier front position because ice melange precluded a closer approach to the ice front (Moffat, 2014). Upstream the present glacier front position the subglacial topography was mapped by a combination of radar and aerial gravimetry data collected in recent years (Millan and others, 2019).…”
Section: Fjord Bathymetrymentioning
confidence: 99%