2017
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ice-free Arctic at 1.5 °C?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates cover the range of findings by Rosenblum and Eisenman (2016) and Screen and Williamson (2017). There is substantial observational uncertainty of Arctic sea ice sensitivity for a given degree of global warming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These estimates cover the range of findings by Rosenblum and Eisenman (2016) and Screen and Williamson (2017). There is substantial observational uncertainty of Arctic sea ice sensitivity for a given degree of global warming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This translates to a global warming of about 1.8 ∘ C relative to preindustrial levels. Screen and Williamson (2017) conclude that the 2 ∘ C global warming target might be "insufficient to prevent an ice-free Arctic." Both these estimates lie within the range of observational uncertainty that we have identified here.…”
Section: 1002/2017gl076159mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates from model simulations that either capture the observed sensitivity or have been bias-corrected, result in similar estimates [36, 39, 42, 43]. Because of the robust relationship between sea-ice coverage and global-mean temperature, the time scale for establishing a given warming is irrelevant.…”
Section: The Impact Of External Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These levels are 1.68 • C for GMT M17 and 1.71 • C for GMT blend−mask (see table 2). Several highly vulnerable systems such as tropical coral reefs (Schleussner et al 2016a) or Arctic sea-ice (Screen and Williamson 2017) are very sensitive to small warming increments. Also extreme weather indicators have been found to robustly increase with increasing GMT SAT (Seneviratne et al 2016) and threshold based indices even in a non-linear fashion .…”
Section: Gmt Blendmentioning
confidence: 99%